Re: WTY results versus ISOGG TreeTrunk
- Right, it is not up-to-date.
As you'll note, the M223 tree hasn't been updated in years either... ISOGG doesn't work very well.
--- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "rob919ert" <robert.hofstee@...> wrote:
> Hello Aaron,
> thanks for answering my questions.
> However there is one thing which I do not understand yet.
> At the notes of the following page
> <http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpI.html> it says:
> Page123: The precise location of Page123 is uncertain. It is derived in
> four men with Haplogroup I1 SNPS and ancestral for one man in
> Haplogroup J. It has not been tested in Haplogroup I2.
> As I am negative for Page123 the above statement is apparently not up to
> best regards and keep up the excellent work,
> --- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "sallfertorr" <sallfertorr@> wrote:
> > Hello, Robert
> > Yes, that is the same SNP. It seems to be an I1 SNP.
> > The 0's to the left don't make a difference. So Page123 is the same as
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> > --- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "rob919ert" robert.hofstee@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Last night I checked my WTY results of kit E5922 (Hofstee
> > > against the so called Tree Trunk of ISOGG.
> > > http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_YDNATreeTrunk.html
> > > <http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_YDNATreeTrunk.html>
> > > Results for haplogroup I were as follows:
> > > L41+; M170+; M258 not tested; P19_1 until P19_5 not tested; P38+;
> > > Page123- (that is PAGES00123 according to WTY-results negative);
> > > not tested.
> > > Is "Page123" in the ISOGG TreeTrunk the same as "PAGES00123" in the
> > > WTY-results? If that is the case why the difference?
> > > It is interesting to check my (roughly) 140 positive SNP's against
> > > ISOGG database.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > > Maassluis, The Netherlands
> > >