Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: WTY results versus ISOGG TreeTrunk

Expand Messages
  • sallfertorr
    Right, it is not up-to-date. As you ll note, the M223 tree hasn t been updated in years either... ISOGG doesn t work very well. Thanks, Aaron Torres
    Message 1 of 4 , May 26, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Right, it is not up-to-date.

      As you'll note, the M223 tree hasn't been updated in years either... ISOGG doesn't work very well.

      Thanks,
      Aaron Torres

      --- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "rob919ert" <robert.hofstee@...> wrote:
      >
      > Hello Aaron,
      >
      > thanks for answering my questions.
      > However there is one thing which I do not understand yet.
      > At the notes of the following page
      > http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpI.html
      > <http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpI.html> it says:
      > Page123: The precise location of Page123 is uncertain. It is derived in
      > four men with Haplogroup I1 SNPS and ancestral for one man in
      > Haplogroup J. It has not been tested in Haplogroup I2.
      > As I am negative for Page123 the above statement is apparently not up to
      > date.
      >
      > best regards and keep up the excellent work,
      > Robert
      >
      > --- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "sallfertorr" <sallfertorr@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Hello, Robert
      > >
      > > Yes, that is the same SNP. It seems to be an I1 SNP.
      > >
      > > The 0's to the left don't make a difference. So Page123 is the same as
      > Page000000000123.
      > >
      > > Thanks,
      > > Aaron
      > >
      > > --- In I-M223@yahoogroups.com, "rob919ert" robert.hofstee@ wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Last night I checked my WTY results of kit E5922 (Hofstee
      > I2b1-X/L1227)
      > > > against the so called Tree Trunk of ISOGG.
      > > > http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_YDNATreeTrunk.html
      > > > <http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_YDNATreeTrunk.html>
      > > > Results for haplogroup I were as follows:
      > > > L41+; M170+; M258 not tested; P19_1 until P19_5 not tested; P38+;
      > P212+;
      > > > Page123- (that is PAGES00123 according to WTY-results negative);
      > U179
      > > > not tested.
      > > > Is "Page123" in the ISOGG TreeTrunk the same as "PAGES00123" in the
      > > > WTY-results? If that is the case why the difference?
      > > > It is interesting to check my (roughly) 140 positive SNP's against
      > the
      > > > ISOGG database.
      > > >
      > > > Robert
      > > > Maassluis, The Netherlands
      > > >
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.