7036Re: Hybrid Artwork
- Mar 8, 2002
> On the subject of artwork, I'm afriad I'll have to go for theThe girl on the Playstation ad had a face distorted. At the time the
> distorted face! I mean, I'm not freak (some say otherwise granted...
> sigh)... but there's nowt freakish about the face at all! In my
> opinion, the face is even kinda cute!!! (sh ock horror!) But, does
> anyone know that this is actually distorted? I mean, who rememb ers
> the Playstation ads a few years back with the girl... is it the same
> person? As fa r as I know, the girl in the playstation ad was
> genuine... so not distorted...!
adverts started running, the company in charge of PR put out a couple of
well-timed press releases implying that the girl in the adverts really
was shaped like that, which got the ads some press attention (for
'exploiting freaks', that kind of thing) from gullible press. However
later on (can't remember exactly when) there were some pictures released
showing an image of her before and after the clever distortion. (Unless
the face was genuine and the pre-distortion pictures were the rouse...
strange how over-clever some of these companies try to be...).
I reckon that the "Wide Angle" cover isn't actually simply using a wide
angle lens, but a graphics package to produce a vaguely similar effect
but with different stretches and a different feel.
For me, neither cover is perfect. The original cover would look better
if there were no people in it, they get in the way of the great
furniture (sorry!) and I too was reminded of the Eels cover when I saw
the second version. I don't think either cover actually fits the album.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>