31181Re: DSP lurches towards a split
- Jul 7, 2006Gould's contributions generally seem destructive and unhelpful.
While it is his democratic right to post them, no-one is under any
obligation to read them, and certainly not to reply. Silence does
not imply consent.
--- In GreenLeft_discussion@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Ström
>been committed to
> In the full article Bob writes:
> "Some things I have seen, in my considered opinion, should not have
> paper at all, and should be discussed privately, which is where acertain duty of care
> comes in. Marcus Strom's schema about total public disclosurewouldn't work in this kind
> of situation."for "total public disclosure".
> This is a total misrepresentation of my political method.
> Bob should take more care to read what people actually write.
> I challenge Bob to show one example of where I have called
> Even Nick Fredman has a more subtle understanding of my approachthan does Bob.
>you [Nick Fredman] give is
> In fact, in my last post to this list I wrote: "The Comintern quote
> just common sense. If you have a disagreement, take it to yourparty cell or branch first;
> don't rush into the public domain immediately. Public debate shouldbe held at the highest
> possible theoretical and practical level - the party press shouldnot be a noticeboard for
> the minor gripes of individual party members."
> A retraction would be welcome.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>