31171Re: DSP lurches towards a split
- Jul 7, 2006In the full article Bob writes:
"Some things I have seen, in my considered opinion, should not have been committed to
paper at all, and should be discussed privately, which is where a certain duty of care
comes in. Marcus Strom's schema about total public disclosure wouldn't work in this kind
This is a total misrepresentation of my political method.
Bob should take more care to read what people actually write.
I challenge Bob to show one example of where I have called for "total public disclosure".
Even Nick Fredman has a more subtle understanding of my approach than does Bob.
In fact, in my last post to this list I wrote: "The Comintern quote you [Nick Fredman] give is
just common sense. If you have a disagreement, take it to your party cell or branch first;
don't rush into the public domain immediately. Public debate should be held at the highest
possible theoretical and practical level - the party press should not be a noticeboard for
the minor gripes of individual party members."
A retraction would be welcome.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>