Re: sal , does your lutino bird look simlar to this bird,
- WillyI suspect that it is possible to have more Parblue phenotypes than we currently recognise. For instance in Scarlet-chested there are the birds with a green back but salmon chest in the cock (Seagreen) that do not fit the definitions we have for either Aqua or Turquoise. Not having seen these 'Emerald' birds first hand, I am cautious about absolute statements, but if they are roughly a 50% parblue with even colour, they fit the definition we have for Aqua.I would like to see 'Emerald' used for a Parblue that was close to wildtype in colour (roughly 25% reduction in psittacin or less).Terry----- Original Message -----From: Willy StobartSent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 6:23 PMSubject: RE: [Genetics-Psittacine] FW: sal , does your lutino bird look simlar to this bird,
Also Mick, when you say ‘emerald’ is this the homo or heterozygous form as in turquoise and turquoiseblue for the other parblue mutation? Is there a difference like there is in the turquoise and turquoiseblue? The former is also coloured from the nest contrary to what Bastiaan says in his book. Is ‘aqua’ the agreed name for the emerald Terry?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Inte Onsman" <inte.onsman@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Genetics-Psittacine] Re: 'Emerald' Cockatiel
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Terry Martin
> To: Genetics-Psittacine@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:05 AM
> Subject: [Genetics-Psittacine] Re: 'Emerald' Cockatiel
> Terry said;
> Do you have any further thoughts to add about the pale legs and bill
> on most specimens, apart from Rick's suggestion of other possible
> being in the mix?
> __I am afraid not. It is unusual in true dilutes, legs and bill show
> pigmentation in dilutes of other species.
> Not sure if you have the new ABK Cockatiel book, but Dirk has one. I
> have some good photos in there comparing the different mutations around
> world and the Australian 'Olive' is perfectly consistent with a Suffused
> mutation but photographically is different to these American birds.
> __I do have the book, however, I cannot explain the pale legs and bill.
> Maybe Rick could be right about a possible mix of mutations.