13589Re: LDS Microfilm "restricted"
- Apr 3, 2007Chris Smolinski wrote:
> No, they didn't get the film, they instead gave a refund on the
> I called the FHL in Salt Lake City (I needed to ask them about
> something else anyway), and they said that it could be because they
> have exceeded the maximum allowed number of copies for the film, or
> that they are no longer allowed to make copies of it, the woman did
> not seem to exactly know. Which brings up a question, is there a
> to find out which FHC have copies of which films? If I found onam
> relatively nearby, I might be willing to drive there to see it (I
> not willing to go to SLC, however ;-)Give each nearby FHC a call and ask if they have the microfilm that
you want in their indefinite loan and temporary loan collection.
> FWIW, it is a film of some PA church records from the late 1700sThe church requested that the microfilm be restricted, or the
> and early 1800s, so I suspect there isn't anyone alive who is
> listed ;-)
microfilm contains other non-related records and those records are
restricted, which restricts the access to the entire roll of
> BTW, the reason for my call was to check on some films I ordered inThere's been a staff shortage in SLC distribution operations.
> January that still have not arrived. They said they are very backed
> up now, running more than 8 weeks late. So if anyone else has films
> on order, don't worry if they haven't come in yet.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>