Re: [GPSL] Duration Flights - New Direction for HABing?
- This was a very interesting feat and the word had to be spread to hams over there to change freqs etc that it was headed there way I know that I sent many emails in several languages to include English, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian,and French was next on my list . I'm sure there were others doing the same thing and many on my attached list were seen on aprs.fi as picking up this signal. I have attached a file of those that I sent a email too and the email text also as my email bombardment grew they were getting the text in all 5 languages.....there were many that had dead emails that I did not include in this file. Any way Congrats to CNSP-11 aka K6RPT-11 for a great job.....
73'skc5wxcOn Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jon Eyes [G7OMN] <g7omn@...> wrote:
I think one of the reasons so much interest was generated was the fact European hams had to make a special effort to retune (or put something else “on” in my case...)
Automatic switching frequencies will make things easier to track and route through APRS IS, but may allow HAB’s to go past almost unnoticed apart from the people who are now signed up as “interested”
Send a few more over – I’m watching for them! ;-)
G7OMN / MB7UCW
I think switching frequencies would be a great idea, and as I posted the other day switching to 145.825 mid atlantic and changing the path would possibly get beacons through the ISS or PCSAT .
I don’t think as much interest would have happened, had it not been for people to easily attempt to take part in the tracking.
A commercial tracker would be easier but a lot less interesting
Well done to the launch team, and also those who tracked and those and also the people who spent time alerting others
I haven't implemented it, but it should be possible for me to modify the BeeLine firmware to do a profile switch based on longitude and switch frequencies when the balloon crosses that line. Lowering the transmit frequency would help, as would shutting down the GPS in between transmissions. The problem with the latter is the quality of the fix that you get when coming back up for a cold reset, but some checks for hdop/vdop thresholds could probably be put in place to address that if necessary.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Pete Lilja <plilja@...> wrote:
With this tremendous Trans-Continental / Trans-Atlantic flight by K6RPT I'm guessing there are others thinking of trying it themselves. Now that we know it can be done what will it take to make it more routine? And what are the pitfalls to work around?
What is the legality? The UK doesn't allow Ham equipment to be flown...is that true elsewhere? What about flights such as this with a flight started where it's legal then moves into a restricted area? (Or do we need to care about that?).
Frequency change in Europe? Fly two transmitters? Those Beeline units are frequency agile and are darned small. I'd think another could be added to a payload easily enough
A timer to start a 144.8 transmitter hours in to the flight to make the European switch?
Batteries? The Lithium Energizers seemed adequate to be sure. Solar power?
Less frequent transmission rate? Seems reasonable. Would doubling the interval time between transmissions double battery life? Would it affect the battery or radio in the cold transmitting less often?
I get the sense this flight has pretty much shaken and turned up-side down the world of HABing - in a very good way. This is the start of some new territory for long distance flying as it now seems so much 'easier' using latex and not using complicated controlled ballast systems.
I need to add my "Well done, CNSP" kudos. This flight has opened some new territory to be explored by more people.
Whatever does come from this I lie the idea that a basic KISS-type flight did it. It keeps a repeat in reach of more people. CNSP seemed to get it just 'right' this time...
--No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.