878PUBLIC DEFENDER SEEKS $2 MILLION REIMBURSEMEN T FOR CITY IN ‘SF-8’ CASE
- Dec 9, 2009Kiilu2@...
I wholeheartedly agree -- this is excellent :) Hooray!!!
Excellent! Next time they'll think twice.
Willie &Mary Ratcliff
SF Bay View
Tamara Aparton wrote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 7, 2009CONTACT:
Tamara Barak Aparton
Communications and Policy Assistant
San Francisco Public Defender’s Office
*** PRESS RELEASE ***
PUBLIC DEFENDER SEEKS $2 MILLION
REIMBURSEMENT FOR CITY IN ‘SF-8’ CASE
San Francisco, CA – As San Francisco grapples with a looming budget crisis, Public Defender Jeff Adachi is seeking $2 million in state reimbursement to the city for its defense of eight men charged in a 1971 homicide case involving a police officer. On Tuesday, December 8, Supervisor Eric Mar and Supervisor David Campos will introduce a resolution at the San Francisco Board of Supervisors’ meeting, urging state officials to pursue reimbursement in the case, known as the “SF-8.”
Adachi has also asked State Senator Mark Leno to introduce special legislation asking for the state’s assistance in recouping the $2 million.
In 2007, the California Attorney General filed charges against eight former Black Liberation Army members --- Herman Bell, Ray Boudreaux, Henry Jones, Jalil Muntaquim (also known as Anthony Bottom), Richard O’Neal, Harold Taylor and Francisco Torres --- in connection with the officer’s killing. The charges had been previously dismissed against several of the men in 1975.
Earlier this year, two of the accused accepted plea bargains made by the Attorney General. Both received probation. The charges against five others were dismissed. Only Torres’ case is still pending .
The city’s right to reimbursement is based on the fact that the California Attorney General took on the 36-year-old case after the San Francisco District Attorney’s office declined to prosecute. The extraordinarily complex case involved 100,000 pages of documents and necessitated an extensive, multi-state investigation.
“This prosecution was initiated by the state. It’s only fair that the state bears the cost of the defense,” Adachi said.
Other counties have successfully recouped costs in expensive cases brought by the state. For example, Assembly Bill 139, passed in the 2005-2006 session, reimbursed Stanislaus County for 100 percent of costs expended in the Scott Peterson trial.