Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Where ignorance is a right

Expand Messages
  • Shaji John K
    Where ignorance is a right 29 Jun 2008, 0337 hrs IST, Arvind Singh Bisht,TNN LUCKNOW: The Right to Information (RTI) Act needs to be put on oxygen in Uttar
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 29, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Where ignorance is a right
      29 Jun 2008, 0337 hrs IST, Arvind Singh Bisht,TNN

      LUCKNOW: The Right to Information (RTI) Act needs to be put on oxygen
      in Uttar Pradesh. A wake up call has almost become a necessity for
      even senior officials candidly admit their ignorance about the Act.
      Ironically, this is the situation which prevails three years after the
      law was enacted on June 15, 2005 by the Parliament.

      What is most disturbing is that neither the chief secretary (CS) nor
      the director general of police (DGP) evinced any interest in creating
      awareness about the Act, according to the observations made in various
      judgments of the State Information Commission (SIC).

      The most glaring example of this is the letter written by principal
      secretary, irrigation, Manjit Singh to secretary SIC. In his letter
      (2416/08-27-Singh-2-3(25)/07 dated June 18, 2008, Singh explained to
      the commission that the delay in granting information to one Tulisi
      Ballabh Gupta, general secretary, diploma engineers and architect
      sangh of the irrigation department, UP, was due to lack of knowledge
      about the necessary procedure under the RTI Act.

      Under the Act, information sought by an applicant needs to be
      furnished by the department concerned maximum within 30 days. In the
      absence of it, the issue could be taken up in the first appeal to be
      heard by the next competent official, appointed for the purpose by the

      However, an applicant under the Act has an option to directly approach
      the SIC after the expiry of 30 days deadline. But in the above case,
      the matter came before the commission only after the applicant
      approached the next competent official, who in that case was the
      special secretary working directly under Singh. But the said officer
      kept sitting over the file.

      Later, he feigned ignorance about the procedure and took it as an
      excuse for the delay. This was also explained in his letter by Singh
      to the SIC.

      However, taking a strong exception to this, information commissioner
      Gyanendra Sharma slapped a fine of Rs 25,000 on the department for the
      delay and also conveyed his displeasure to Singh, asking him to hold
      refreshal courses in the RTI Act for officials working under him.

      Sharma further ordered that a copy of his order should also be served
      to chief secretary office. "I am sure this would be an eye-opener for
      the chief secretary and help him evolving some method to sensitise
      officials in the state," Sharma observed in his order.

      But what makes matters worse is that the commission has found that the
      CS office does not have its own website like other departments nor has
      it appointed its own information officer. While raising these
      questions, the commission has sought to know from the CS about the
      manner in which it deals with issues raised under the RTI Act in the
      absence of an information officer.
      The police department, perhaps, presents the worst picture. "It's
      pathetic that district police chiefs have flagrantly violated the
      norms for giving information to the applicants under the RTI Act and
      also refused to comply with the order issued to this effect by the
      DGP," Sharma observed in his order.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.