Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Amit Baruah: Unequal partners? ( A rising India is closing its strategic options by allying too closely with the United States.)

Expand Messages
  • mohammad imran
    Date:02/03/2006 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2006/03/02/stories/2006030203531100.htm Opinion - News Analysis Unequal partners? Amit Baruah A rising India is
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Date:02/03/2006 URL:
      http://www.thehindu.com/2006/03/02/stories/2006030203531100.htm

      Opinion - News Analysis

      Unequal partners?

      Amit Baruah

      A rising India is closing its strategic options by allying too closely
      with the United States.

      SINCE THE July 2005 visit of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to
      Washington, the Indo-U.S. relationship has been the subject of
      considerable debate in both the Indian and the American press
      principally for the statement of intent on civilian nuclear
      cooperation. Even as the last word on a nuclear deal will be clear
      during President George W. Bush's ongoing visit, another initiative the
      Prime Minister undertook is, perhaps, even more controversial. And that
      is the promotion of democracy along with the U.S. around the world.

      Agreeing to a "global democracy initiative" last July, the two sides
      said, "India and the United States share a fundamental commitment to
      democracy and believe they have an obligation to the global community
      to strengthen values, ideals and practices of freedom, pluralism, and
      rule of law.

      "With their solid democratic traditions and institutions, they have
      agreed to assist other societies in transition seeking to become more
      open and democratic. They recognise democracy as a universal aspiration
      that transcends social, cultural and religious boundaries."

      This grandiose formulation also commits New Delhi to "organising
      together" with the U.S. training courses in India, America, or a third
      country where necessary, to enhance capabilities to strengthen
      democratic institutions and develop their human resources. This
      initiative must be read together with the new, bilateral defence
      framework of June 2005, which holds that the Indo-U.S. defence
      relationship derives from a common belief in freedom, democracy, and
      the rule of law, and seeks to advance shared security interests. In
      pursuit of this shared vision, the defence establishments of the two
      sides shall collaborate in multinational operations "when it is in
      their common interest".

      So, if the next "democracy" project of America is, say, Iran, the U.S.
      can legitimately invoke this new framework for "multinational
      collaboration". Of course, in India's "enlightened national interest",
      the Government may say it's not in the "common interest", but, then,
      the U.S., by a formal mechanism, can legitimately request Indian troops
      for Iran.

      When Manmohan Singh and George W. Bush stood together to announce
      their global "democracy" initiative, Iraq was burning. According to
      iraqbodycount.net, an independent website, a minimum of 28,535 and a
      maximum of 32,153 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the March 2003
      American invasion.

      Since May 2003, when Mr. Bush announced that his "mission" in Iraq had
      been "accomplished", it's estimated that a total of 2,149 American
      troops have been killed in what was once a peaceful and safe West Asian
      nation.

      Of this 2,149, as many as 1,734 perished in combat with what
      increasingly looks to be a sophisticated and organised resistance
      against the U.S., which is beginning to show signs of panic and a
      desire to embrace a still unclear exit strategy.

      In the name of democracy, Iraq stands at the crossroads of a
      full-scale civil war. America has failed on all counts: be it the
      building of democracy, infrastructure or even minimum safety conditions
      for the people of Iraq. In the name of democracy, American troops have
      resorted to abuse and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners; the
      American state, in reality, has lost the right to speak about human
      rights' abuses in other parts of the world.

      In the name of democracy, America under Mr. Bush set up the biggest
      con job in selling the war on Iraq: that Saddam Hussein possessed
      "weapons of mass destruction".

      The Indian Parliament was one of the few in the world, at the prodding
      of Congress party, which called for an immediate withdrawal of foreign
      troops from Iraq. Today, the resolution is forgotten as successive
      Indian governments rush to embrace American foreign policy as their
      own. A much poorer, resource-constrained India spoke for national
      liberation movements in Palestine and South Africa. America, on its
      part, is the biggest impediment to an independent Palestinian state and
      was also the biggest collaborator with the apartheid regime in South
      Africa.

      A much richer, resource-endowed Indian state now believes that its
      "place in the sun" can only be ensured by promoting an American version
      of democracy, whose next act Washington wants to perform in Iran.

      A rising India is today closing its strategic options by allying
      closely with the United States. Some years ago, it would have been
      considered a general insult for the U.S. to say that it would "help"
      India become a global power. Now, sections of India's strategic elite
      simply applaud such statements.




      © Copyright 2000 - 2006 The Hindu
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.