Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Ref: Neglect of the poor

Expand Messages
  • mohammad imran
    Date:30/05/2005 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2005/05/30/stories/2005053003631000.htm Opinion - Leader Page Articles Six on ten sounds right for this
    Message 1 of 1 , May 29, 2005
      Date:30/05/2005 URL:

      Opinion - Leader Page Articles

      Six on ten sounds right for this Government

      P. Sainath

      The United Progressive Alliance Government has no sense of how serious
      things are in the countryside. It seems to have forgotten what and who
      brought it to power.

      PRIME MINISTER Manmohan Singh's report card seems to be bang on. Six
      on ten sounds about right. This Government took two exams to arrive at
      that score. It chalked up ten on ten in the pro-corporate,
      help-the-deserving-rich test. And two on ten in the pro-poor exam to
      bring it up to 12 on 20. On average, I guess that works out to six on

      Take the continued feeding frenzy at the corporate trough run by
      Indian banks. They've written off some Rs.45,000 crore "stuck in NPAs
      (non-performing assets)." Some companies now walk off with close to
      Rs.100 crore each in "bad loans." These have been deemed "not

      Sure, much of this happened during NDA rule. But the loot and scoot
      sortie did not subside after the UPA came to power. NPA write-offs rose
      16 per cent in 2004 and there is no sign they will decline. "Paucity of
      funds" applies to the needs of the poor. Never to corporate robbery.

      A handful of companies have been gifted more than what the Government
      spends each year on public health. The country's primary education
      goals could also have moved far ahead with that much money. (While on
      education, the two per cent cess to go to the `Prathamik Shiksha Kosh'
      is yet to be set up.) The UPA grudges every paisa it will spend on its
      whittled down rural employment guarantee scheme.

      Banks' ploy

      Meanwhile, banks quietly convert short-term farm borrowings into
      long-term loans to pre-empt any chance of a write-off. For many this
      will mean a worse debt burden. (The rules for corporates, however, are
      very different.) And there has been no increase worth the name in rural
      credit or investment in agriculture.

      Banks are actually shutting shop in many places. The share of rural
      areas in the total number of bank branches fell quite a bit in the
      1990s — and continues to fall. As Dr. P.S.M. Rao points out, in 1990
      there were nearly 35,000 branches in rural regions. That is, over 58
      per cent of total branches. By 2003, rural branches were down in both
      absolute numbers and percentage. Now they account for under half of the
      total branches. The more the banks wiggle out, the more moneylenders

      The UPA has no sense of how serious things are in the countryside. It
      seems to have forgotten what and who brought it to power. Even in
      colonial days, the Raj was forced to take note of rural distress, usury
      and its impact. `Agrarian disturbances' arising from debt and usury saw
      a slew of laws enforced in the late 1800s. Today's response is a token
      `fine tuning' of the system. It's as if May 2004 never happened.

      The few faltering progressive steps of the UPA seem more the result of
      pressure from its chairperson than from anyone within government. And,
      of course, from a Left berated for villainy each time it speaks.

      It's hard to spot a single piece of pro-poor (rural or urban)
      legislation that this Government addressed with energy in the past
      year. Legislation like the Seed Bill will make things a lot worse for
      Indian agriculture. Contrast this with the vigour it displays each time
      the SENSEX records a dainty flutter. Or the zeal in pro-corporate moves
      in FDI, mining, disinvestment in profit-making PSUs, retail trade,
      corporate tax — you name it. (So the NDA was a bunch of bad guys, but
      NDA policies were fine.) It's the continuity, not the break, that
      stands out.

      There's more. As of this week, the frenzied last minute purchase of
      inputs — and loans from moneylenders — begins as the monsoon
      approaches. New kinds of loans, on obscene terms. New forms of
      exploitation coupled with old ones, unfold. The stress on rural
      households is hard to describe. In 2004, farmers in Vidharbha hit by
      crop failure found that each time they returned to the input dealers,
      prices were jacked up. In some cases by 100 per cent.

      Cartels at work

      None of this seems a matter of concern. Nor does the rigging of prices
      by cartels, both local and global, move the Government. This has in
      fact intensified in the past one year. Coffee growers in Kerala commit
      suicide while coffee prices rise at the global level. The product
      booms, the producer goes bust. Pepper growers have likewise been
      hostage to cartels.

      Chilli farmers in Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh despair as prices
      tumble. Trader networks across borders have rigged a fall in both
      States. Tonnes of Andhra chilli arrived in Nagpur this month just in
      time to destroy prices there. This, after similar games had crashed
      markets in Warangal and Guntur. The matter excites no discussion.
      Serious governmental action — zero. Get into any of this and you're
      told that agriculture is a state subject.

      Not something the Centre can muck around with. We'd love to help, but
      we really can't. That etiquette in no way hampers the Centre from
      striking deals at the global level that impact massively on agriculture
      in every State.

      Rural crisis

      If things have not changed in the past year, it's because the basic
      policy framework hasn't. Distress migrations are up. Rural jobs are
      down. Rural debt is up. And farm suicides persist. A Kisan Sabha survey
      of just 26 households in Wayanad that had seen suicides shows a total
      debt of over Rs.2 million. Or about Rs.82,000 per household. The
      average size of these farms is less than 1.4 acres. And a good chunk of
      that debt is owed to private lenders. Nothing has happened in the UPA's
      year in office that will alter this course of events.

      As work gets less, more people leave their villages in distress and
      hunger. In just the past few months, bus and rail traffic on major
      migrant routes in different States has gone up. As indeed it has for
      the past several years. In Wayanad, for example, about the only
      profit-making body in the district is the Kerala State Road Transport

      Sure, these problems cannot be solved overnight. Certainly not in the
      year the UPA has had. But it was a period when right steps could have
      been taken. When even firm intent is lacking, then the figure `two' on
      the pro-poor report card is no more than a grace mark from the
      kind-hearted professor.

      Nothing has happened, for instance, to halt the collapse of the Public
      Distribution System (PDS). Nor the fall in purchasing power of millions
      of poor people. The bill brought in to ensure 100 days work per family
      is faint-hearted. The idea that 100 days is enough, even ample, is
      wrong. It shows no appreciation of the nature and extent of the
      problem. And treats it as separate from much higher costs, or lack of
      basic facilities like health and housing. (This bill also excludes the
      urban poor.)

      Meanwhile, the drive towards the privatisation of just about
      everything continues. Those States where the UPA's members are in power
      lead the way. There is not the slightest sign that the Centre wants to
      halt the insane rush towards privatisation of water. Its Planning
      Commission chief has often signalled his bias for that step. Nothing
      could be more fatal, but it seems the way we're headed. There is not a
      single instance of a success in handing over water to private hands
      anywhere in the world. But that hardly deters the Congress-NCP in
      Maharashtra from racing towards it.

      The Prime Minister, though, can take heart from the fact that his
      report card reads better than that of the media. Take writers in a
      leading business daily on the lowest third of society. "The bottom 400
      million," says one, with a heavy heart, "is a disappointment and a
      social responsibility, and while it harbours value (maybe not a
      fortune), it is a difficult market to tap." (ET, March 26, 2005). Shame
      on you guys down there in the 400 million. That's enough distress and
      despair. Time to pull up your socks and be better buyers. (And whaddya
      mean, what socks?) What are the malls for, anyway?

      On the other hand, take how Lakme India Fashion Week is covered. This
      event has been for some time a microcosm of the world the media
      inhabit. This year was no different. Journalists outnumbered buyers
      three to one. Unlike the bottom 400 million, the tiny number of buyers
      is not a disappointment. Even more interesting, buyers at the show were
      dependent on designers for their passes. The media were not. Their
      place was assured. What would the LIF Week and the media do without
      each other?

      Both UPA and media flunk the rural test. But the absence of debate on
      this in the media — and the Government — does not mean an absence of
      debate itself. We live in a more radical world than many imagine.

      © Copyright 2000 - 2005 The Hindu
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.