Re: UL: New member- wanting info on registration and insurance- quicksilver mxl 2 sport
- On 08:45 PM 4/9/2013, Richard Williams wrote:
>Bob,Yup.. And flight instruction is NOT carrying people or property for hire. Not the same thing!
>I think FAR 91.319(a)(2) applies to this discussion.
>Aircraft having experimental certificates; operating limitations
>(a) No person may operate an aircraft that has an experimental certificate--
>(2) Carrying Persons or property for compensation or hire.
>Since the instructor is 'for hire', this is forbidden.Wrong. Not the same thing.
>and FAR 91.319(e)(2) does not apply since this is after January 31, 2010.You are mis reading (e)(2)... (e)(2) talks about being compensated for USING THE PLANE. In other words, airplane rental. (e)(2) is not limiting a CFI's ability to be compensated for HIS/HER time.
>I have read that LDAs are not being written as they would (for instance) allow aThe LODA guidance is supposed to be issued to a particular AIRCRAFT, not instructor... and that aircraft is supposed to be the one that same instructor owned and had used as a trainer before, so yes, you're correct (assuming these idiot FSDOs are following the STUPID Loda guidance as written)
>CFI to train in their (or their students) grandfathered ELSA.