Re: Primer question
- --- In FLY-UL@yahoogroups.com, "Dave and Jean Matheny"
> Mark wrote :there,
> "The stock 400 fuel system has afairly high 'draw' to the pump>
> > Not sure whre you monyed the primer but if it is on the dash, it might
> > take twenty pumps to fill empty lines. . ."
> It's on the same plate as the ignition key and choke. (Kinda crowded
> But yes, that leaves a pretty long line to the carb. I experimented
> pumping the primer many times, but that didn't seem to improvethings over
> the 3-stroke approach. In fact, it was so much worse the engine justwould
> not start.getting
> No, 3 pumps seems to be the magic number . But it sure acts like fuel
> starvation after starting to run.
> I think I will keep an eye on the line and see if the fuel is really
> there after 3 strokes.My plane actually doesn't use the primer but the good ol' bulb/choke
arrangement. I don't like it a great deal, but it's actually the
better solution on this plane. The primer was tried by the previous
owner and then removed - the long run to the tanks as well as the
generally cramped area there under the motor makes locating the primer
difficult. He reported lots of problems getting gas up to the carbs
with it which makes sense given the installation. He removed it and
went back to the bulb.
I use the bypass around the bulb as well, a rather comical but
actually fairly sensible compromise. I can't argue with how well it
works though - starts on the 3rd pull every time and catches
immediately and fully...... So I'm leaving it alone right there as it
has worked over the 450 hours currently on the plane.....
As far as long runs with the primer, even on my trike where access to
the right side of the motor was very open and the run to the tank was
only a foot or so, it took quite a few pumps of the primer to get gas
to the carbs.....
- The word "working" or "pumping" doesn't matter much since the
throttle only goes forward and aft:) Nobody ever explained what
it was suppossed to accomplish:)
If your entire gripe was when Mark changed the word "working" to
"pumping", why didn't you point that out clearly instead of all
the other BS in your posts?
Just another smoke screen to hide another Pitcher screw up Mike.
Mike Huckle wrote:
> > From: Robert Metzler <sleepy6@...>
> >Nice try Mike. Lets look at it. The guy says his engine runs
> >for 5 seconds. Pitcher tells him to "work" the throttle as he
> >slowly pumps the primer. Seems like an awful lot for an amateur
> >to accomplish in that 5 seconds of run time:) It also seems like
> >Mark was right when he called it "pumping" the throttle because
> >that's all the guy will be able to do.
> >BTW, The guy has one hand pumping the primer and one hand
> >"working" the throttle. I guess he is gonna pull the starter
> >with his foot:)
> I'm just hoping he can keep out of the prop.
> I don't have any primers, and don't "work" or "pump" the throttle.
> Set choke on and hit start.
> Works for me.
> >Just another case of Huckle playing word games to back up his
> >buddy Ricks screw up. You can play your silly games along with
> >Pitcher but most on the list are wise to you too:)
> Just another case of Metzler playing word games to back up his
> buddy Mark's screw up. You can play your silly games along with
> Smithy but most on the list are wise to you too:)
> You can apologize now Metz, and then move on.
> Rick never said "pumping the throttle", and that's now clear to all.