Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

14958Re: [FJGRailroad] Re: Amsterdam, NY

Expand Messages
  • Gino's Railpage
    Feb 8, 2011
      OK, I thought it went down the hill at one time or another and couldn't believe the grade they had
      to manage...

      On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Paul Larner <pklarner@...> wrote:

      What ascends can also descends; my mind was riding one of the east bound trips to Rockton Jct.  The line went both up and down Vrooman.  The magnetic brakes used in Amsterdam were originally required because of the Market Street hill.  All Amsterdam "city" cars were equipped with the magnetic brakes.  Vrooman Ave line wasn't constructed until 1911.  Shortly after, can't recall off the top of my head, the line was relocated to use Forbes and Lark Sts., thereby avoiding the lower part of the grade.  IIRC, you can see lclearly where the tracks made the turn into or from Forbes onto Vrooman.  Men were employed to apply sand to the rails ahead of the trolleys climbing the hill.
      I have heard or read that the line was none too popular because of the hill.  When folks had a choice, they chose to go down Market St.



      To: FJGRailroad@yahoogroups.com
      From: fjgrailroad@...
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:01:36 -0500

      Subject: Re: [FJGRailroad] Re: Amsterdam, NY

      I thought the belt line went down Vrooman Street Hill.  I figured it had to cross the ACN right at the top of the hill.  Aren't there stories about heavy duty breaks being used because of Vrooman?  Maybe the busses went down Vrooman and I'm confusing a story?


      On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Jerry Snyder <handyman756@...> wrote:

      Your description is very close to the alternate I mentioned with the line running up James Street.  The rest of that one had it following the path you describe with Edson St. and Forest Ave.  That would make more sense than running it through the 5 corners, but that is the only map of the line that I have.  I've never been able to find a map showing it laid out as you describe, just the text description.  The map I sent Paul isn't dated but as it mentions Mohawk Mills Park it must be post 1934 when the name changed from Jollyland.  I know the Belt Line was shut down by then so maybe my map isn't accurate.  Given that the area where the lines crossed wasn't really very developed at the time, it would explain why none of the city directories note a street crossing.

      --- On Sun, 2/6/11, Paul Larner <pklarner@...> wrote:

      From: Paul Larner <pklarner@...>
      Subject: RE: [FJGRailroad] Re: Amsterdam, NY
      To: "FJGRailroad" <fjgrailroad@yahoogroups.com>
      Date: Sunday, February 6, 2011, 10:31 AM

      The Belt line crossed the AC&N once. 
      After ascending Vrooman Ave. the line went left on Edward St. to a point that would be Pulaski St. today, where it turned right. Between there and Teller St. the AC&N was crossed at grade.  Turning left into Teller St. (laid out, but not an improved street at this time period) the line proceeded to James where it went right to Edson St. then left in Edson and across Church St.  After crossing Church the line went onto private right of way turning north and running several hundred feet parallel to Forest Avenue.  At this time, late twenties, Forest Avenue, like Teller Street, does not appear to be an improved street. After passing under the high tension wires, the belt line moves into the center of Forest Ave.  At Clarke St. the line follows the north side of Clarke to Sloane Ave., then to Clizbe and onto Rockton Jct.   Intermediate turnouts were on Teller St. and Forest Ave. shortly before the turn onto Clarke.

      To: FJGRailroad@yahoogroups.com
      From: handyman756@...
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:28:53 +0000
      Subject: [FJGRailroad] Re: Amsterdam, NY

      The Amsterdam Belt Linn didn't cross the ACN on Vrooman Ave. The Belt Line turned off of Vrooman and went west on Edward Street before it got far enough north to hit the ACN. Depending on which map you believe, the Belt Line either crossed the ACN on James Street right where Kellogg Street joined James, or it ran diagonally from the intersection of Edward and James into that wonderful intersection we Amsterdamians call the "5 Corners". If that was the route it would have had to cross the ACN twice, once on the line going to Kellogg & Millers and the Sanford complex and again on the line running up to Smellie & Vorhees paper mill and the Upper Mohawk Mills. So far I haven't been able to pin down the exact route in that area.

      --- In FJGRailroad@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Kelly's Heros" <fjgrailroad@...> wrote:
      > Paul Larner knows these answers for sure! What map did you download? Don't forget, the Amsterdam BeltLine crossed the ACN on Vrooman Ave.
      > Gino
      > --- In FJGRailroad@yahoogroups.com, Paul Charland <p.charlie@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Hi All,
      > >
      > > I'm working on the Kellogg Branch in Microsoft Train Sim. Originally I
      > > was going to do a '70s version of the branch but have been thinking of
      > > backdating what I have to the late 30s when the line used an 0-8-0 for
      > > power, the Kellogg and Miller linseed oil plant was still active and the
      > > FJ&G was still running the electric division through Amsterdam.
      > >
      > > I'm looking for any maps or photos that would show the line, I've been
      > > able to download a 1931 map that appears to show a double track mainline
      > > coming off East Main Street, turning southeast before it starts to
      > > parallel the NYC yard... might even be where the eastbound lanes of
      > > (new) Route 5 are now. If this is so, how did the NYC's Kellogg Branch
      > > and the FJ&G trackage cross, at grade, or did the NYC have the ramp and
      > > overpass they have now back then?
      > >
      > > Any help would be appreciated.
      > >
      > > Paul :-)
      > >

    • Show all 14 messages in this topic