Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [FHCNET] Re: Missing ordinances on extraction generated submission.

Expand Messages
  • Snow, Donald R.
    Jim and Eileen, IGI batch C005296 was extracted from FHL film #0494195 which consists of New Jersey records, Births Atlantic-Hudson v. 12 1882-1883 . So it s
    Message 1 of 6 , Jul 19, 2008
      Jim and Eileen, IGI batch C005296 was extracted from FHL film
      #0494195 which consists of New Jersey records, Births Atlantic-Hudson
      v. 12 1882-1883 . So it's from the temple file and maybe waiting for
      other ordinances, too. Regarding IGI batches without the film
      number, we've got a database here at the London FHC that we can look
      up most of them in since our patrons find so many of them and want to
      know the film so they can see the original record.

      Elder Snow


      At 02:16 AM 7/19/2008, James W Anderson wrote:

      >Try it again both with and without login to be sure it's the same
      >one (it is, but seeing if there is something else odd doesn't hurt),
      >here are the complete details on the birthplace and date.
      >
      >15 November 1882
      >Chester, Burlington, New Jersey
      >
      >(no United States).
      >
      >--- On Fri, 7/18/08, Ileen Johnson
      ><<mailto:ileenjohnson%40gmail.com>ileenjohnson@...> wrote:
      >From: Ileen Johnson <<mailto:ileenjohnson%40gmail.com>ileenjohnson@...>
      >Subject: [FHCNET] Re: Missing ordinances on extraction generated submission.
      >To: <mailto:FHCNET%40yahoogroups.com>FHCNET@yahoogroups.com
      >Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 6:01 PM
      >
      >James,
      >
      >I searched for Harry H. Bozearth b. 1882, date range 5 years, United
      >
      >States, New Jersey and found him. Then I noticed I had not logged in
      >
      >to see the ordinance dates, so I signed in and searched again. Could
      >
      >not find him using the same parameters as above. When I searched
      >
      >without loggin in, the source showed C005296 Type: film, no Source
      >
      >Number. Interesting. . . .
      >
      >--- In FHCNET@yahoogroups. com, James W Anderson <genealogy248@ ...> wrote:
      >
      > >
      >
      > > I've got a problem trying to resolve an issue regarding a name me
      >
      >and another consultant found and connected to a tree that has the
      >
      >baptism and confirmation dates, but show the rest of the ordinances as
      >
      >'in progress' four years later.
      >
      > >
      >
      > > No record is found even in the old IGI of this name. No other
      >
      >records exist save for the one record for this person even in nFS for
      >
      >the individual, and there are no combined records.
      >
      > >
      >
      > > There is however an extraction batch number, C-005296, found in the
      >
      >notes, which is how it got to the Boston Temple and had the first
      >
      >ordinances performed, and I would assume the rest also, but no way
      >
      >exists right now of telling for sure whether it was there or
      >
      >elsewhere, or whether the rest of the ordinances even got done.
      >
      > >
      >
      > > Here's my other consultant's individual.
      >
      > >
      >
      > > Harry H. Bozearth
      >
      > > b. 1882
      >
      > > PID M5MX-7XK
      >
      > >
      >
      > > The problem is Support thinks (twice now) that this was submitted by
      >
      >a member, and did not see the extraction record. It's from a
      >
      >birth/christening record of some sort.
      >
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >

      Elder Donald R. Snow, England London Mission
      London Family History Centre (formerly Hyde Park Family History
      Centre), http://www.hydeparkfhc.org
      Retired Professor of Mathematics, Brigham Young University, Provo,
      Utah; snowd@...

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.