Re: [FHCNET] NewFS for non members
- Could you post where and how non-member staff can request permission? Members can do all the registration online using their membership number and confirmation date. What documentation will the non-members need to provide to establish they are who they claim to be? We don't want the fruitcakes to be able to circumvent the system and gain access just because they send an email to the right department.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Miles Meyer" <milesmeyer@...>
> I wanted to make one clarification to my earlier comment. Family History[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Consultants who are nonmembers can request permission to access nFS.
> However, these are the only nonmembers that I know of who can currently
> access the data.
> On 10/10/07, Miles Meyer wrote:
> > From what I have read, nFS will be opened up to nonmembers once the full
> > > rollout is complete. They will have to make some adjustments to the program
> > > to remove temple ordinance dates, just like the current FamilySearch, before
> > > it is released to the public.
> > Miles Meyer
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> List owner: ileenjohnson@...
> Unsubscribe: FHCNETfirstname.lastname@example.org
> Subscribe: Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FHCNET
> or send blank email to FHCNETemail@example.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- --- In FHCNET@yahoogroups.com, "Russell Hltn" <RussellHltn@...> wrote:
> On 10/13/07, Chris Tinney <vctinney@...> wrote:
> > NOT!
> > And it will not contain multiple sealings of a women
> > to multiple husbands, etc. It will be a sealing book,
> > with the Holy Spirit of Promise for every individual,
> > having correct relationship and exact information,
> > as events transpired upon this earth, in real time.
> Think of it as a first draft - and a necessary step in getting to
>REPLY: Where Do You Draw the line?
Discussions indicate that perhaps it will
be allowed for all temple ordinance work
to be done for individuals, using the data
from only a marriage record entry. Any
woman or man, married more than once, will
have their ordinance work repeated for each
separate marriage record, without any way
of avoiding the duplication, except on rare
occasions. Then again, logic suggests the
next step will be to perform sealings, and
all ordinance work, from divorce filings.
Will "family group sheet" entries for those
individuals, who have names of father and mother,
as parents only, be done over and over again,
as individual child submissions are made,
each giving a different approximation date
for the marriage of the father and mother,
from each individual child entry submitted?