Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Queries on The Science of Nukes vs the BS* of Thermite

Expand Messages
  • shaman_nation
    Queries on The Science of Nukes vs the BS* of Thermite From: Charles Boldwyn Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:44 AM To: Ed Ward MD Cc: Barbara Honegger ;
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 23, 2012
      Queries on The Science of Nukes vs the BS* of Thermite

      From: Charles Boldwyn
      Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:44 AM
      To: Ed Ward MD
      Cc: Barbara Honegger ; Barrett Kevin ; christopherholmes@.net ; Dwain Deets ; Dean Hartwell T. ; Felton-Greg-Vancouver ; jack etkin ; h_dooty2@.com ; Webster Tarpley ; Tasker Tony ; Susan Lindauer ; Splitting-The-Sky-TVH ; Rodin-Ernst-TVH ; Peter Valant ; raprockprof2@.com ; nicholas kollerstrom ; Moret Leuren ; Masud-Enver-TVH ; Josh Blakeney ; jeff prager ; Donald Fox ; Clare Kuehn ; dfox682000@.com

      Subject: Thermite

      Ed,

      How is thermite prep use conclusively disproven and only, only mini nukes used conclusively proven?

      http://rense.com/general77/geddno.htm, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/482, and some more coming with the public posting.

      Re: Nukes:
      History Channel Molten Metal At Ground Zero - The World Trade Center, Rise and Fall of an American Icon, Richard Riggs amongst a background of nuclear devastation talks about molten metal. 42 seconds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ogrupgt4mI

      Molten WTC Rock - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbMu2w7fSG8&feature=related

      Molten Metals under WTC 6 weeks after 9/11 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmMLDG87Sak&feature=related

      A nice compilation of 'molten steel' observations. Excerpt from Blueprint for Truth. 8 minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqJSDn5dgJc&feature=related The Thermite portion is BS - Bogus Science to hide the use of nukes.

      The Mystery of WTC 6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVs4oMQEpvs&feature=related

      For the referenced facts see what's been being hidden by most 'truth' orgs for 6 years.

      US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

      Update: The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

      Update: Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Updated Broken Links
      --------------------------------------------------------

      Why does it have to just be one form of explosive and no incendiary use?

      First, There were at least 3 `explosives' used, RDX or similar explosive used in ALL demolitions (used as cutting agent and another charge used to blow the cut structure), nukes and at least one incendiary grenade to make sure all fuel would burn. In order to fit in basic physics, chemistry and reality, the devices must be capable of producing every bit of evidence individually and in total.
      -----------------------------------------------------------

      How does the cut line circumventing the top 14 floors of WTC-1 happen without thermite incendiary, the top block allegedly crushing the lower 102 floor block?

      RDX or similar explosive, it's what is used in ALL demolitions, no demolition companies use thermite – NONE. How does one demolish a building using thermite – with thousands of demolitions show one that used thermite in the actual demolition – just one will do.
      -------------------------------------------------------------------

      How would you convince one with an open mind that no incendiary could possibly have been used?

      In order to have a billion pounds of super heated residue - it takes 1 gm of thermite to melt 1 gram steel - would require a billion pounds of thermite. A river of molten steel would require a river of thermite. A ton of molten metal would require a ton of thermite, super thermite, or double top secret invisible thermite. 100 tons of molten metal would require 100 tons of thermite. Continue ad infinitum. Also see above answers.

      Chuck Boldwyn
      *Bogus Science

      On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:52 PM, "Ed Ward MD" <edward19> wrote:
      Good ole censoring VT? LOL. I've posted on VT in the past, up until I destroyed Duffs BS nukes hidden in US by Israel – by pointing out that anything planted years ago WOULD BE USELESS since nukes require constant maintenance. I was immediately personally attacked by other posters (typical of covert ops sites) and banned from any further posting. Interesting group running VT. It's a link I missed. Thanks.
      Ed
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.