Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Review of The Karma Seeker

Expand Messages
  • prometheus_973
    Hello Non, Oh, okay. I thought you were referring to all earth based manmade religions. Of course Scientology claims it isn t earth based and yet it seems to
    Message 1 of 16 , Apr 15, 2013
      Hello Non,
      Oh, okay. I thought
      you were referring
      to all earth based
      manmade religions.
      Of course Scientology
      claims it isn't earth
      based and yet it seems
      to be dominated by
      males. Eckankar was
      supposed to have
      originated or based
      on Venus and it is
      dominated by only
      male LEMs.

      Yes, it seems that
      women did have
      a somewhat better
      role in Nature based
      religions. But these
      are rather minor
      and uninfluential
      and have almost
      died out. Wicca
      is another minor
      nature based religion.


      "noneckchains" wrote:

      Your quote of me is taken out of context and I wasn't speaking of the present
      time, necessarily. I'm a little confused by your response, to be honest.

      I think I was referring to some Earth Based religion or spirituality, such as
      Native American, in which there is an emphasis on "Mother Earth" and a
      relationship and reverence for Nature as sacred, a desire to live in harmony and
      respect for life. Of course some of this may be stereotypes, and not true in all
      cases. I recall a documentary about Natives, in which women had the final say in
      major decisions. At the same time, there were roles to be played by women and
      men. Another documentary, The Burning Times, shows how there was an attempt to
      destroy any remnant of a strong role for women in spirituality and culture, as
      the patriarchal Churches became extremely entrenched in the further subjugation
      of women. But the film does point to a time in which women, in usually Earth
      Based spirituality, did seem to have a more equal footing.

      I admit that what I have written is kind of sketchy and that I have not provided
      specific sources. I will just say that I personally, tend to identify with a
      more Nature form of spirituality, that does not necessarily have an
      anthropomorphized "God".

      Non ;)

      P.S. here is one source on ancient Celtic society and women.


      --- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, "prometheus_973"
      <prometheus_973@...> wrote:
      > Hello Non and All,
      > I really don't see that
      > "women have often
      > had an equal or even
      > a major role in society."
      > Major role yes, equal
      > role no. Women are
      > unequals in government,
      > business, and religion.
      > 50% of the population
      > are women but they aren't
      > represented, proportionately,
      > in high office. It's a private
      > boy's club. Just look at
      > the Master's Golf Tournament
      > as well as the Augusta
      > Country Club memberships.
      > And, let's not forget that
      > Black men had the right
      > to vote before all women.
      > Prometheus
      > p.s. What does "Earth based
      > religions may be different"
      > mean?
      > All religions are manmade
      > and their God was created in
      > man's own physical and/or
      > mental image.
      > If there were more advanced
      > civilizations out there in the
      > universes, which there probably
      > are, I would doubt very much
      > that they believe in religion.
      > noneckchains wrote:
      > I think she is referring to "Rod"
      > in the patriarchal sense of the
      > male organ, known by some as
      > an erect penis...:)
      > I believe it is true that in religion
      > generally, males have had the
      > power and have attempted to
      > keep women in their place, although
      > sometimes brainwashed women
      > also preach the same thing and
      > apparently wish to be subservient
      > to males.
      > Earth based religions may be
      > different, in that women have
      > often had an equal or even a
      > major role in society.
      > "Rod of Power" I suppose
      > could have different meanings
      > and kundalini energy and
      > the spine is interesting. I don't
      > recall "Rod of Power" being
      > defined this way in eckankar
      > though.
      > Non ;)
      > etznab@ wrote:
      > >
      > > In the Vedas, Kundalini is addressed as a goddess. She is Vak, the
      > > deity of speech. And in Egyptian, Messi (messiah) is the name of a
      > > serpent designated the "Sacred Word" (Logos).
      > >
      > http://www.kundaliniresearch.org/moses.html
      > >
      > > According to well-known teacher and translator Eknath Easwaran,
      > > kundalini means "the coiled power," a force which ordinarily rests at
      > > the base of the spine, described as being coiled there like a
      > > serpent.[11] The concept can be found under different names. For
      > > example the 8th century Tantrasadbhava Tantra uses the term kundali
      > > ("she who is ring-shaped").[12]
      > >
      > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kundalini#Etymology
      > >
      > > I guess it depends on what you mean by "rod". If rod is symbolic for
      > > the spine, or conduit, then women have "rods" too. And the spine is a
      > > "rod" which channels energy to the head and brain. Women and men both
      > > have these.
      > >
      > > What does the phrase "Rod of Power" really mean? Power suggests Shakti,
      > > IMO. I would even go far as say there can be no "rod" without "energy",
      > > or "power". For example, can a double helix of DNA form without
      > > "energy"? Can an atom maintain it's form without energy? Can a man even
      > > be born without a womb and matrix to feed it energy?
      > >
      > > Just saying :)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.