Re: A "Chocolate Master?"
- --- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, ewickings@a...
> In a message dated 10/1/2005 5:23:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,have had any
> mishmisha9@y... writes:
> Mish Writes:
> The "chocolate master" Rich is referring to is Michael Owens
> I am wondering why Rich is calling Michael Owens a
> chocolate master? I don't know Michael Owens but this seems like a
> racist comment to me.
> *** Mish it sounds like a racist comment to me too! And if you
> dealings with sailor boy, you would understand his ignorance! Heis nothing
> but a cyber hacker, posing as a higher than thou clergy boy!Believe me I
> have had my share of his wackiness; I shared what happened to meover on
> Ford's BB's. Rich Smith hacked into my computer right after Ileft eckankrap.
> Cost me several hundred dollars to get back on line! But I stillkeep
> surfing. ;-)wouldn't
> > As much as I don't care for HK's writings and
> talks, especially his recent Wisdom Notes, I don't think HK would
> have stooped so low as to make a racial comment.
> *** If he wants to keep his various ethnic group members happen he
> publicly make a racial comment! But then again with his latestWisdom Note,
> who knows what he is capable of spewing?Maybe, Harold
> > In my opinion, Rich should be demoted to a lower initiate.
> needs to cleanthey could
> his own house first!
> *** With all the money Klemp and Co. rakes in, you would think
> hire a watch dog to keep the swordsmen / and women undercontrol. Rich's
> ignorance, demonstrates that new lower eck initiates are morespiritually
> mature / developed when they first join eckankrap, than most ofHarold's current
> higher initiates.-----------------------------------------
rich, cher, etc have simply 'picked a side'. that is so patently
obvious. they have picked a side, and, by god, theyre sticking to it -
tho they have no idea what they are defending. if it has eck words
its good, otherwise, its bad.
perhaps i told this story on here before, but here goes again: i did
a little experiment some time ago. i posted quotes/passages from
various eck literature, but claimed authorship - or attributed them
to some other anti-eckker. those a.r.e. eck-butts tore hell out of
the passages. calling it stupid, low level, social realm, bullshit.
btw, many of the quoted passages came from the shariyat....on the
other hand, i sometimes made up convulted hi sounding bullshit, and
claimed i had gotten it from the shariyat. i would post it, and
attack it as bullshit. the eckkers always defended it if i said it
was from shariyat. and trust me, the crap i wrote myself made no
sense at all.
i never called them on their idiocy. it was just too pathetic.