Re: Why Isn't Klemp Talking About the Zohar?
- And why is Klemp so secretive? He really does not embody any kind of "Being Alive". Living? More like the walking talking Dead eck master. The most audible sound that Klemp gives anyone is a loud, irritating SNORE!
Non eckster ; )
--- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, "prometheus_973" <prometheus_973@...> wrote:
> I was wondering what the purpose
> is in having a "Living" ECK Master?
> Klemp still promotes, and sells, Twitchell's
> "Stranger by the River" but where is
> Klemp's "current" version of this book,
> or his own unique work? Where's Rebazar?
> And, why are ECKists being encouraged
> to purchase Twitchell's old talks (EK
> history) now in CD format?
> It's another money maker, of course,
> but it takes the ECKist backwards into
> the past and into a state of lower consciousness.
> Then again, these talks do show the
> scam behind Eckankar. After all, according
> to Klemp, Twitchell had been under
> Rebazar's tutorage for years and according
> to PT was given the 12th initiation in
> the 1950s. So it does seem odd that
> Twit never mentions the "Mahanta," and
> other important points, in his 1966 talk:
> "The Way of ECKANKAR."
> Therefore, if Twitchell's works are
> being pushed upon ECKists, what is
> the point with having a "Living" Master?
> Has the "Living" master (Klemp) written
> any Shariyats or anything as worthy
> or as comparable to the books of Twitchell?
> Klemp claims to be a/the infallible Mahanta,
> but as the LEM he is supposed to give a
> "current" view of the world to his followers
> and guide them through tough times.
> Instead, this so-called "Modern Prophet"
> hides away most of the year and talks or
> writes about traveling to the Astral "Sun
> Worlds" with Rebazar and about going into
> the past to Atlantis, etc. in order to renew
> Soul's "golden contract" with the M/LEM.
> Klemp mimics others with generalized doom
> and gloom comments (and EMF fears) while
> avoiding precise predictions... except for one:
> "Eckankar is meant to be here not just for
> decades, but for centuries-- even for millennia."
> But, didn't PT and DG say the same things?
> An EK prediction, The Invasion of the Zohar!
> Doesn't HK agree with Twitchell that an alien
> space race (The ZOHAR) is to come and take
> over the earth? This is mentioned on pg. 243
> of Klemp's first (1998) Lexicon.
> On pages 186-187 Klemp mentions that this
> invasion and "colonization" will occur after
> a "catastrophe in the "twenty-first and twenty-
> second centuries." Also, the ECK Master, SEPHER,
> will be responsible for "the spiritual welfare
> of the Zohar" (those aliens who murder/destroy
> the human race).
> Too bad that good old Sepher didn't have
> more influence over the Zohar prior to the
> invasion! LOL! But how "spiritual" are those
> who invade and annihilate another race?
> So, what are Klemp's views/predictions on
> this EK theology? This is the 21th Century
> and, according to HK, time is running out!
> Tick-tock, tick-tock!
> Klemp should be addressing the future and
> not the past simply because by the time it
> gets into print it's the present or near future!
> The past is too easy to comment upon and
> too easy to do 20/20 hindsight rewrites.
> And, since Klemp is promoting himself as
> a "Modern Prophet" then he should attempt
> to live up to the his own hype. ECKists should
> hold him accountable to address current
> world issues, as well as, these doom and
> gloom EK predictions. Instead, we see him
> attempting to sell more and more EK materials
> which contain nothing new. It's merely
> repackaged and/or put into a current CD/
> DVD/MP3 format. The President and EK
> Board could make those decisions without
> Then, again, the Catch-22 for ECKists is
> that they aren't permitted to complain (it's
> negative) or to second guess the LEM (who
> is also the Mahanta). They are to practice
> the Law of Silence. But, are ECKists always
> expected to practice this EK Law without
> exception? If someone wrongs you or makes
> a mistake then shouldn't you speak up?
> Sure! Therefore, it's okay that they don't
> remain silent on matters of theology. Soul
> equals Soul correct? Thus, why is Klemp
> above responsibility?