Yes, HK mentioned the NINE Supreme Court Justices
in his "example" of the infamous Clarence Thomas.
Next, the "example" was of the candidates chosen by
the NINE Founding Members of the Knights Templars.
But Klemp forgot to mention any connection to the
NINE Silent Ones of EK and, thus, did not use the
EK Principle of the Threes!
[Klemp's post cognitive abilities of looking at the
past (20/200 hindsight) is how he manipulates the
And, once again, Klemp not only dwells in the past,
but also uses tunnel vision (again) to make an analogy.
What about Thomas' testimony before Congress and
the despicable way Anita Hill was treated? As a lower
courts judge, lawyer, and law school student Thomas
was mediocre at best... like Klemp! HK overlooks
Thomas' "moral" behaviour as Mish points out in her
post on HONESTY.
BTW- HK mentions in his H.I. Letter article that "LIFE"
is the "NO-NONSENSE TUTOR!" And Henry the VIII was
the No-Nonsense Tudor! LOL!
Anyway isn't this "Tutor" really the KAL! Of course! Why
would Klemp omit mentioning the KAL? Probably because
KAL has more power and authority than Klemp... the so-
called LEM/Mahanta! Therefore, KAL is the NO-NONSENSE
TUTOR of ECKists as well... and KAL doesn't require a yearly
monetary ($) membership donation, service requirements,
training classes, or the purchase of EK Materials to help
him live a financially secretive and grand lifestyle!
There are also Nine Supreme Court Justices. I believe.
(At the present, and for some time.)