Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Rebezar Tarz is not found outside of Eckankar--Why?

Expand Messages
  • prometheus_973
    Hi Mish, As for Rich s yawn - This blockage is due principally to the fact that they wish to find words which will express the effect of their thought, yet
    Message 1 of 5 , Mar 21 2:19 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi Mish,
      As for Rich's yawn - 'This blockage is due principally to the
      fact that they wish to find words which will express the effect
      of their thought, yet not reveal anything which will expose the
      ego.' [Rebazar Tarzs, Dialogues With the Master, pg.77]

      Prometheus


      mish wrote:
      >
      > Here is yet another exchange between the former
      > eckist and another eckist on the A.R.E. thread
      > discussion regarding the fake Rebezar:
      >
      >
      > The former eckist asks:
      > " Do you have anything at all to show that Rebezar
      > Exists ????? "
      >
      > An H.I. eckist, Rich, replies:
      > "Yaaaawn..."
      >
      > So, once again, if an eckist cannot answer factually
      > and truthfully, he/she will turn a blind eye because
      > truth is not as important as being ignorant in regards
      > to truth and reality. Truth is boring to an eckist--so it
      > is implied with Rich's "yaaaawn." A mind is a terrible
      > thing to waste! Pity!
      >
      > Mish
      >
      >
      > --- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com,
      > "mishmisha9" <mishmisha9@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > Hi, All!
      > >
      > > A former eckist has posted a new thread on A.R.E.
      > > asking why the name Rebezar Tarz is not found
      > > outside of Eckankar--and he is asking why is that?
      > >
      > > An eckist gave this response:
      > >
      > > "Where in Eckankar does it say that you should
      > > expect someone else to provide you with answers
      > > and physical proof of anything? Why is this issue
      > > important to you?"
      > >
      > > It is really interesting how unimportant proof is
      > > to eckists. They are really caught up in imagination
      > > and delusion. When they can't provide tangible
      > > evidence . . . well, they just side step it like this
      > > eckist does. When eckists can't answer a question
      > > straight on, they throw one back. Nice trick, but
      > > really it doesn't work--this distraction of the issue!
      > > LOL!
      > >
      > > Mish
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.