Re: the new cher - isn't so smart or aware after all!
- Hello Zoey!
After reading this post, I now know who you are, as I recall you
sharing this same story under a different name! ;-) I appologise
for calling you a troll when you first joined this group. I hope
you will continue to share your "pre and post" Eckankrap experiences
--- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, "zoey_true"
Couple of years back a friend and I confirmed, for anyone with sense
to see, what cher is all about. I set myself up as a detractor,
while my friend set himself up as pro-eck. My friend would post
passages which he credited to klemp or twitchell. Mostly these
passages were hogwash. Although the passages sounded quite
esoteric, they were totally senseless manure. Cher would praise
them, agree with them, condone them, etc etc etc simply because he
put the eck brand on the mess. Sometimes he posted passages that
utterly contradicted eckankar perceptions, and again, they sounded
quite mystical. As long as the stuff was attributed to eck
literature, chernobyl was dancing on her fat little feet in
I, on the other hand, posted passages straight from klemp and
twitchell. I often quoted the shariyat. Because I was a known
detractor, chernut tore sh** out of it all. It's not that I would
expect even the most aredent eckist to memorize the entire eck
library, but the passages I posted encapsulated key concepts. But I
attributed them to Ford, or Lane, or whoever; so the enlightened
eckists pissed on their own scripture.