3337Re: The Telephone Game
- Apr 29, 2008Hello All,
I would, also, say that each early government/
country of the world encouraged a certain religious
thought (religion) as a means to control the populace.
Religions are still used today, by religious leaders,
governments, and politicians to placate people and
to distract them and to give them hope while they
are led down a primrose lane of delusion and, even,
sometimes to their destruction by these same self-
centered power brokers.
Many religions first began with non-scientific
explanations for the cosmos. There was Ra the
Sun God, and Zeus (or was it Apollo?) driving a
Golden Chariot across the sky. Everything about
life and nature was explained away with a little
help from real, distorted, and imagined observation.
People's lives in the past and today become fragmented
and fractioned as they try to pursue opportunities
in creative innovation in every sphere of human action.
The Mosaic conception of God was particularly relevant
to twentieth century need. First, the Abrahamic "old man
in the sky" is quite unbelievable in this scientific age.
He is a "theistic" God, being "out there" in space, a God
who "has a world." The Mosaic God without finite form
is everywhere present. This is "panentheism." It means
God is in (en) everything, and everything which exists
is "in" God. Therefore, the divine center of meaning
is to be found within. The God within must be a kind
of World Spirit which wears the universe as its body.
Tillich argued that God was not the Creator of the
universe, because that implied that creation was an
activity confined to some remote time in the past,
but that God was creativity, implying that the creating
goes on in every present moment and that God is in
every innovative moment in human endeavor.
Anyway, students of religion, of history, and of man
can see where and how religion has progressed and
increased its hold on people and has changed throughout
world history. Religion can be a complicated topic with
one's personal beliefs and experiences mixed in with
those of others. Religion includes myth, superstition,
tradition and a hodge-podge of other things according
The bottom line is that each of us should have our own
personal and private religion and be that religion's leader!
The group and mob mentality to conform (group think)
and directed by "leaders" is not a path to freedom. Religious
hierarchies have the same purpose as the non-secular
political hierarchies they were modeled after. It's to control!
> Hello Mish,
> I agree that kernals of truth are not enough to make a religious
> teaching valid. Last night, I was contemplating upon the main
> ingredients of most religions:
> 1. Borrowed elements from other religions.
> 2. Inner experiences of the founders/leaders.
> 3. Punishment and/or exclusion of people with inner experiences or
> opinions that contradict those of the founders/leaders.
> The punishment or exclusion may include blame, social disapproval,
> several forms of harassment, excommunication or even burning
> heretics at the stake (as it happened in the Middle Ages).
> There is of course the business side, but I'm currently focusing
> upon those elements that are specific to religion. I'm not denying
> that religion is also about control and money.
> By the way, I think that kernels of truth can be found both in the
> inner experiences of the founders/leaders, borrowed elements from
> other religions, and the inner experiences of those who disagree
> with the founders/leaders.
> --- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, "mishmisha9"
> <mishmisha9@> wrote:
> > Hello, Jivat, Etznab and All!
> > First, Jivat (hope you don't mind I've shortened your name),
> > to ESA. I've enjoyed your posts. And Etznab, nice that you share so
> > much of your research and thoughts here. : )
> > I guess one could say there is nothing new under the sun in
> > regards to religions, the old and the "new!" The interesting thing
> > that we need to remember is that for a con to work or for a leader
> > to gain a following, truth and fiction have to be mixed. Many
> > people will look for truth to validate what is being sold. The
> > mistake is believing that finding a kernal of truth in a religious
> > teaching makes it valid or truthful in all portions of it. Or that
> > the obvious duplicity is okay because that one kernal of truth
> > is more important than all the lies. This IMO is flawed rationale!
> > I think the best thing to happen to eckankar is Harold Klemp. He
> > is such a ridiculous head of church that Saturday Night Live could
> > create some good skits, or even better, just imagine what Steven
> > Cobert would do with this self-proclaimed godman, "the highest
> > consciousness known to mankind" delusional fool! LOL! It sure is
> > fun to poke fun at him, isn't it? And doesn't Klemp make eckankar
> > look dumb and silly??
> > Anyway, why do we need religion? Why do we cluster in groups
> > trying to find a stairway to heaven? I suppose much of it has to
> > do with the fear of the unknown and the safety in numbers. For
> > the con men like Klemp, there is the need to be important and the
> > need to control other people and to feed off their money and
> > devotion.
> > I'm reading an interesting book called "Under the Banner of Heaven"
> > by Jon Krakauer. It is about the extreme religious beliefs of
> > Mormons and how it has evolved to present day. I probably shouldn't
> > use the word "evolve" because evolution really speaks of
> > through the ages. Fundamentalism stays in the dark ages and refuses
> > to grow and improve beyond growing in membership.
> > I'm waiting for Klemp's next book--I so enjoyed reading "Those
> > Wonderful ECK Masters," published in 2005. Seems that Klemp is
> > slow writing these days--is he lazy or befuddled as to how to
> > continue his lies and schemes?? I'm sure he is still wanting to put
> > Joan up there as Co-L.E.M. I'd almost bet he's hell bent on doing
> > because he has to prove that he can do it and not be thwarted by
> > critical thinking individuals who can see through his cons! LOL!
> > With eckankar under Klemp the con has evolved while individual
> > spirituality has stagnated! Too bad, so sad! : )
> > Mish
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>