3335Re: The Telephone Game
- Apr 29, 2008Hello Mish,
I agree that kernals of truth are not enough to make a religious
teaching valid. Last night, I was contemplating upon the main
ingredients of most religions:
1. Borrowed elements from other religions.
2. Inner experiences of the founders/leaders.
3. Punishment and/or exclusion of people with inner experiences or
opinions that contradict those of the founders/leaders.
The punishment or exclusion may include blame, social disapproval,
several forms of harassment, excommunication or even burning
heretics at the stake (as it happened in the Middle Ages).
There is of course the business side, but I'm currently focusing
upon those elements that are specific to religion. I'm not denying
that religion is also about control and money.
By the way, I think that kernels of truth can be found both in the
inner experiences of the founders/leaders, borrowed elements from
other religions, and the inner experiences of those who disagree
with the founders/leaders.
--- In EckankarSurvivorsAnonymous@yahoogroups.com, "mishmisha9"
> Hello, Jivat, Etznab and All!
> First, Jivat (hope you don't mind I've shortened your name),
> to ESA. I've enjoyed your posts. And Etznab, nice that you share sofundamental
> much of your research and thoughts here. : )
> I guess one could say there is nothing new under the sun in
> regards to religions, the old and the "new!" The interesting thing
> that we need to remember is that for a con to work or for a leader
> to gain a following, truth and fiction have to be mixed. Many
> people will look for truth to validate what is being sold. The
> mistake is believing that finding a kernal of truth in a religious
> teaching makes it valid or truthful in all portions of it. Or that
> the obvious duplicity is okay because that one kernal of truth
> is more important than all the lies. This IMO is flawed rationale!
> I think the best thing to happen to eckankar is Harold Klemp. He
> is such a ridiculous head of church that Saturday Night Live could
> create some good skits, or even better, just imagine what Steven
> Cobert would do with this self-proclaimed godman, "the highest
> consciousness known to mankind" delusional fool! LOL! It sure is
> fun to poke fun at him, isn't it? And doesn't Klemp make eckankar
> look dumb and silly??
> Anyway, why do we need religion? Why do we cluster in groups
> trying to find a stairway to heaven? I suppose much of it has to
> do with the fear of the unknown and the safety in numbers. For
> the con men like Klemp, there is the need to be important and the
> need to control other people and to feed off their money and
> I'm reading an interesting book called "Under the Banner of Heaven"
> by Jon Krakauer. It is about the extreme religious beliefs of
> Mormons and how it has evolved to present day. I probably shouldn'tadvancement
> use the word "evolve" because evolution really speaks of
> through the ages. Fundamentalism stays in the dark ages and refusesso
> to grow and improve beyond growing in membership.
> I'm waiting for Klemp's next book--I so enjoyed reading "Those
> Wonderful ECK Masters," published in 2005. Seems that Klemp is
> slow writing these days--is he lazy or befuddled as to how to
> continue his lies and schemes?? I'm sure he is still wanting to put
> Joan up there as Co-L.E.M. I'd almost bet he's hell bent on doing
> because he has to prove that he can do it and not be thwarted by
> critical thinking individuals who can see through his cons! LOL!
> With eckankar under Klemp the con has evolved while individual
> spirituality has stagnated! Too bad, so sad! : )
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>