2059Re: Twitchell Info on ECKANKAR.org Shows Deception
- Dec 31, 2006Hi Etznab,
Basically, these quotes on PT, by Klemp, are the only
ones I'm referring to when I ask for an opinion based
on the "Timeline" Klemp gives in this Twitchell info.
My conclusions are simply based upon the obvious and
in the connecting of the dots by using the facts provided
by Klemp and Company. It's really just an exercise of
using simple logic, common sense, and opening one's
awareness and eyes. It's elementary my dear Etznab.
'There are none so blind as those who cannot see.'
> Here's more conflicting information that is currently
> being shared on ECKANKAR.org.
> "BEHIND the SCENES WITH PAUL TWITCHELL"
> From: "HIS OWN DRUMBEATER" by Harold Klemp
> "At 27 years of age, the most Paul had ever done
> was to teach physical education. But by the time
> he wrote it all up, exaggerating and twisting the
> facts, he worked up a nice little paragraph about
> all of the grand achievements of one Paul Twitchell.
> He made it sound quite impressive. You can see why,
> after hours of reading so many dull entries, the editor
> of Who's Who in Kentucky thought Paul sounded pretty
> interesting. WITHOUT BOTHERING TO CHECK OUT THE
> DATES OR DETAILS, HE PROBABLY SAID, OH, WHY NOT
> --AND PAUL GETS INTO WHO'S WHO IN KENTUCKY
> RIGHT ALONG WITH THE MOST DISTINGUISHED LEADERS
> IN THE STATE."
> So, Paul was 27 YEARS OLD when he was doing all of this
> lying and had not done anything, except, teach phys. ed.
> Also, Klemp in the Shariyat Books 1&2 on the copyright
> page gives Paul's YEAR of BIRTH as 1908.
> *THEREFORE, 1935 IS WHEN PAUL WAS 27 YEARS OLD!
> This next quote comes from "LOOKING AT THE PAST FOR
> SPIRITUAL LESSONS" by Harold Klemp.
> "Paul first met Rebazar Tarzs in 1951 in the foothills of
> the Himalayas near Darjeeling. BEFORE THAT ON HIS FIRST
> TRIP TO INDIA IN 1935, HE MET SUDAR SINGH."
> Ironic isn't it? That KLEMP and his ECK LEADERS
> have made the same mistake that the editor of the
> 1935 edition of Who's Who in Kentucky did:
> "Without bothering to check out the dates or details,
> he probably said, Oh, why not..."
> [SINCE PAUL'S FIRST TRIP TO INDIA IN 1935 HAS BEEN
> PROVEN TO BE FALSE-THIS MEANS THAT THERE WAS
> NO "SECOND" TRIP TO MEET REBAZAR!]
> This is the conflicting information that ECKists
> should be more concerned with because it shows
> that the very foundation of ECKANKAR was created
> by a proven liar!
> It is, also, obvious that Twitchell lied about REBAZAR
> as he had about SUDAR SINGH (970th LEM).
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>