vendor at Echo Lake Sunday am, about 9:40-10:30 or later
- A physical trainer took over a good sized hunk of the north east lawn this morning (about half-tennis court size) and spread out about ten mats, set up a table with a basket and other stuff. When I passed by a short time later, at least a dozen people were synchronized to the trainer's instructions.This person is probably charging while using prime lawn space at the park. This is just as bad as the guys on blankets selling used clothing. How do we stop this? Adam? Christine?Judy Raskin
- The idea that the boathous has to be repainted its "historic" color (which Michael O'Brien points out is an unknown hue) is a fool's errand indeed. I don't think the color is of any cultural historic relevance at all. It's simply plain wasteful.
The notion that the city could blithely toss $47k at the job which should cost at most 20% of that amount is simply demonstrative of how dysfunctional our city government is, why we're in the financial mess we're in, why the streets are a mess, why many sidewalks are unwalkable, and why there's trash piled everywhere. Our tax dollars are simply being whimsically wasted by our elected officials. It makes one laugh through the tears.
At 06:42 AM 10/29/2013, you wrote:
- Adding my voice to the chorus -- 47K? It's a small building. How
could it cost that much?
- -----Original Message-----
- From: Trey Baskett
- Sent: Oct 29, 2013 1:46 AM
- To: "EchoElysianNCForum@yahoogroups.com"
- Subject: Re: [EchoElysianNCForum] Re: vendor at Echo Lake Sunday am, about 9:40-10:30 or later
- Is it grant money or federal money with specific stipulations on its use? Andrew, I understand there is a process of funding projects but can't we wait until it needs painting again to spend that 47K? Why not have council move to put the money in escrow and earn some interest until the boathouse needs painting? Or move to re-appropriate the money for another cause. Happens all the time. It just seems to be a waste of money and effort to repaint it at this time while the city is in such dire straits financially. Don't think it sends a great message to this stakeholder. Was it painted by general services or an outside contractor? If it was an outside contractor have them eat the 47K. Which BTW is exorbitant.
- On Monday, October 28, 2013 6:19 PM, Jennifer Deines wrote:
- Thanks for clearing that up. Many local issues are much more complicated than they appear.
- Sent from my iPhone
- On Oct 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Garsten wrote:
- >Echo Park Lake is a Cultural Historic Monument. When the boathouse
- >renovations were done, the people supervising the work made a casual
- >decision that changed the historic nature of this very historic structure.
- >The city cannot take money from one thing and simply apply it to another
- >- this is VERY SIMPLISTIC thinking, and a giant corporation like the
- >City of Los Angeles is anything but simple.
- >If you think that money could be well spent on this or that, let your
- >councilmember's know, and they will try to find the budget in the line
- >items that cover those issues, or establish a budget for future years.
- >In the meantime, we are fortunate that the funds were found to get the
- >boathouse FULLY restored, and not FOOLISHLY restored as it is now.
- >On 10/28/13, 5:41 PM, Jennifer Deines wrote:
- >> I'm with you all on this one. $47k for a paint job seems over-priced
- >> and, for right now, unnecessary. Wait a few more years until it
- >> actually might need a paint job, and then do it.
- >> In the meantime why don't we spend some money on trash cans? There
- >> are not nearly enough of them along Sunset and around the side street
- >> areas. They are always over-filling.
- >> Power-washing sidewalks and retaining walls near exhaust stained bus
- >> stops would also really improve things.
- >> Perhaps not as satisfying as a boathouse makeover, but sometimes a
- >> little housecleaning can make a place feel so much more like "home."
- >> Perhaps these are designated funds for the boathouse-- anyone know?
- >> Sent from my iPhone
- >> On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Scott Fajack >> > wrote:
- >>> This is L.A. We might as well just tear it down--it's only history.
- -----Original Message-----
- Adding my voice to the chorus -- 47K? It's a small building. How could it cost that much?