Re: [EchoElysianNCForum] Re: NYTimes.com: How Wal-Mart Used Payoffs to Get Its Way in Mexico
- "Grocery union" is a joke.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Isa Meksin <lagunaecho@...> wrote:
How does one access the article?I felt the Walmart issues more complex - not having a grocery store in that apartment complex for so many decades should have been a community issue and the grocery unions should have been approached to recommend stores which had good union policies - and the community go to those stores and ask them in - and show support to shop there. Walmart was filling the need - which should have been filled by an entity the community, in good conscience, would support.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Judith Hansen <judithcheerful@...> wrote:frankly, I was not against Wal-Mart coming in. I am against ever shopping there and supporting it.One of the reasons:
Sent by judithcheerful@...:
By DAVID BARSTOW and ALEJANDRA XANIC von BERTRABWal-Mart de Mexico was an aggressive and creative corrupter, offering large payoffs to get what the law otherwise prohibited, an examination by The New York Times found.
Or, copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://nyti.ms/U5hTe0 To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add nytdirect@... to your address book. Advertisement Copyright 2012 | The New York Times Company | NYTimes.com 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018