Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [E_Rapier] Val Day / Peerage

Expand Messages
  • John Enzinas
    ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA --g
    Message 1 of 100 , Feb 13, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Aaron Miedema <govianus@...> wrote:
      > Fencing Peerage.  100% bad idea.  Fencing is made unsafe by
      > hyper-competitiveness and politics.  This will do little but increase
      > both.  In the long run I can see it doing little but making the game
      > political and hyper-competitive.  On the plus side it should be a boon for
      > WMA and HEMA.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      --g
    • Aaron Miedema
      Irene, thanks again for you input and weighing the contrary points of view. I too have seen the sence of it taking too long for elevation. But, typically it
      Message 100 of 100 , Feb 21, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        Irene, thanks again for you input and weighing the contrary points of view.

        I too have seen the sence of it taking too long for elevation. But,
        typically it is on the part of person who is seeking the rank "Hells bells,
        what do I have to do to get noticed." =) Living on the edge of a Kingdom
        for much of my time in the SCA, I chalked it up to being on the edge of a
        Kingdom. Although, to be frank the ins and outs of the awards system has
        not ever irked me, it has left me alone, and I have left it alone.

        You are correct that "peers behaving badly" is a personality and case by
        case experience. The counter question would be, how many individual
        cases does it take to form a theme? =) Once again it is a glass half
        empty half full kind of discussion. One can acknowledge individual trees,
        but sometimes trees are part of a forest. =)

        I think that there might be regional/kingdom differences. I'll go out on a
        limb and express my opinion, I suspect Ealdormere suffers from more
        fractious and passive-aggressive politics than in most kingdoms. Two
        things make me suggest this. First, the Kingdom has a fairly hight level
        of membership, but only slightly more than half of that membership is
        active in the cantons. In other words, there are alot of people who like
        the SCA but aren't interested in participating in the administration of the
        kingdom. Now this is only one potential broad readings of the statistics.
        The second is that I am having this discussion with peers from out of
        kingdom. Not that I mind that, the out of Kingdom perspective is good. I
        suspect there is a certain amount of insecurity within the kingdom that
        motivates people prefer to not engage in such discussions of cabbages and
        kings. =) In the end I think that this may simply add to isolation and
        resentment. But that is merely my opinion. =)

        Thanks again Irene.
        --
        Aaron Miedema, B.F.A., B.A., M.A.
        Historian
        Author of *Bayonets and Blobsticks, The Canadian Experience of Close Combat
        1915-1918*, available from Legacy Books Press.
        http://www.legacybookspress.com/books.html#Bayonet


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.