Re: [E_Rapier] Re: Gorget Rules / Proposed implementation
- The concern voiced had to do with the definition of "throat" for
required rigid protection coverage. Some people felt that this
definition did not include the carotid arteries but rather just the
windpipe. I suspect that the requirement for 95% rigid protection is a
result of this difference of opinion so as to prevent any discussion
Given I wear I fully rigid gorget I suspect it is fairly easy to guess
where I stand on the requirements for neck protection.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:53 AM, thltoymaker <thltoymaker@...> wrote:
> From THL Gerrard Carpentarius:
> I am a huge fan of playing safely: However in my most humble opinion as long
> as the throat
> ( windpipe / carotid arteries ) are fully protected in any position the
> fencer might engage in ( This would include a reasonable overlap coverage )
> then the Gorget is more than safe.
> The Spinal coverage is in itself already well into "more than adequate
> protection ".
> Considering that the odds of an adequate blunt force hitting just in the
> right manner at that spine dammaging spot is even more remote given that we
> must lay our blades on our opponents shoulders for a kill. Yet I also
> appreciate that no one wants to be a quadriplegic. To that end I am
> satisfied with this protection .
> I personally love padding behind my gorget.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Yahoo! Groups Links