2611Re: [E_Rapier] Rapier Man at Arms ?
- Sep 24, 2012I really like Comrade at Arms.
For a variety of reasons:
Less offensive / Less confusing
I have yet to create the Parameters of what a Comrade at Arms would
entail, however Its very likely the most important things.
Like Play safe
( Embrace defeat ) etc..
( so far Im just formulating seeking advice on concept )
Which this discussion has been very fruitful !!
May thanks and other thoughts most welcome.
If you wish or prefer contact me at thltoymaker@...
On 9/24/2012 7:11 PM, Kathleen Gormanshaw wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:33 PM, thltoymaker <thltoymaker@...
> <mailto:thltoymaker%40cogeco.ca>> wrote:
> > From Gerrard:
> > Is there any convention that would not allow a Rapier Man at Arms?
> > Not a Master of Arms.
> Some knights take "Men at Arms" as a role for someone who isn't a
> squire but might become one, someone who they want to encourage or
> help grow. I think it would confuse people to use the same phrase for
> a different purpose.
> I'm confused by your question, though, what would your relationship be
> with this person? Are you equals in knowledge? Equals in skill?
> Helping each other improve equally? Helping each other improve in
> different skills? Is one person more experienced than the other?
> "Rapier at Arms" sounds like the sword you're holding in your hand,
> not like a person. Comrade in Arms sounds like a person you fight
> with regularly, whom you might train with, and you're fairly equal in
> skill and experience with that person.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>