Re: [EKSouth] Why not allow AV material, etc. was: Re: Link to 8 Year Old ...
- It IS something to reconsider, (not meaning to
take the place and role of my Dutchess and
Moderator) whether to allow acceptence of letters
with attachments (disableable by user) these days
when everybody is running at a minimum T-1 and
many homes pay $15/mo + Cable to get T-3+ speed. >>
I run several Yahoo lists and moderate a couple more.
NONE of the lists I manage allow attachments, and it has nothing to do with connection speeds. My computer is brand new, and I have a digital cable hook up.
Too many virii come through in attachments, and I choose not to run that risk. If you want to open your computer up to all kinds of malware, you go right ahead, but don't berate others for not doing so. And not everybody runs a minimum T-1. My dad still uses dial up. He simply isn't online enough to justify the extra expense--and since he spends half the year in Florida and half in Michigan, he doesn't want to deal with switching things over twice every year either.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 17:11, Dianne <goofy4@...> wrote:
>I run several Yahoo lists and moderate a couple more.I also own and moderate a bunch of YahooGroups and *none* of them
>NONE of the lists I manage allow attachments, and it has nothing to do with connection speeds.
allow attachments, for that very reason, virii.
Mitchell MacBain, Bâro et Miles Orientalis
- Note: in a separate communication, I told the author of some possible
remedies, of the threat/legal sort.
But, to the point, which is excellent.
Even computer ownership is not universal and many still need the
Library to follow us.
If they even know we're here.
There are many available free web sites out there, which might be
found and obtained for posting of short-term/long term work as
determined by the moderator if we do not go crazy.
(btw) if you want a computer, not the fastest but good enough for
e-mail, a few carcasses off the streeet and some basic knowledge and
friends can genmerally get you a computer. I donate the makings of
about one or two machines a year, either to friends who need a last
piece, or a slow old machine, at most for the price of shipping,
though I suggest our $5/gallon recession will soon cut down on the
number of "upgrades".
My favorite was a 1962 core block I had had sitting here after I
found I was one week too late to save the ancient mini it belonged
to. Why, I never knew. 12 years after I got it and mentioned it on
line, my name got to a Dutch museum crew who found That Exact
Machine, sans core block, which someone had taken as a desk ornament.
There will soon be 2 PDP-5s left in running condition in the whole
world because I saved that block of junk.
I found a company tossing 5 of what had been the cheapest, most
worthless Pentium-zip machines 8 years ago. I have a supply of 1x CD
readers (some may write) and a replenished screw stock because I
grabbed more than they were worth.
At 01:59 PM 6/9/2008, you wrote:
>In a message dated 6/9/2008 11:28:22 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
><<It IS something to reconsider, (not meaning to
>take the place and role of my Dutchess and
>Moderator) whether to allow acceptence of letters
>with attachments (disableable by user) these days
>when everybody is running at a minimum T-1 and
>many homes pay $15/mo + Cable to get T-3+ speed.>>
>Don't presume to think you speak for everyone. I know several people who
>do not have internet connections at home at all who are active in the SCA. I
>myself am still on dial-up with a max speed of about 64000 bps if I'm lucky,
>and likely to be for a while yet given the fact that neither the phone lines
>nor cable lines to this house can handle the input of a higher speed system,
>and we can't afford either rewiring or any other higher speed system I can
>And before you tell me that I don't know what I'm talking about, no, we are
>not on digital cable because the lines in this house can't carry the load.
>We tried it three times thinking we were getting bad decoder boxes before we
>figured out what the problem was. And the house has got plaster walls so it's
>no easy task to replace the cable line that comes in at the back of the
>house and is used at the front. And no, I don't want to pin the
>cable lines up
>along the ceiling, thank you.