Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-171-2 VCS

Expand Messages
  • Jesse Buehler
    I say keep the switches. I don t have th on my quad slope but I really, really wish it did! I d rather an offset/attenuator for the far fewer times I ve used
    Message 1 of 26 , Dec 14, 2012
      I say keep the switches. I don't have th on my quad slope but I really, really wish it did! I'd rather an offset/attenuator for the far fewer times I've used bipolar outs.

      Ymmv of course.

      Sent from my iPhone

      On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Martin Fay <martin@...> wrote:

      > Bit of a late entry here, but there appears to be a choice between
      > including the cycle switch (not found on a stock STS DUSG) or a
      > bipolar output (present).
      >
      > Cycle can be patch-programmed with a patch cord from Gate to Trigger,
      > then if Gate is used for anything else it would need to be mult-ed.
      >
      > Bipolar can be patch-programmed using i.e. an offset/attenuator module.
      >
      > Is this trade-off worth a poll at some point?
      >
      > Martin
      >
      > Sent from my iPhone
      >
      > On 12 Dec 2012, at 15:11, <yahoo@...> wrote:
      >
      > > As the negotiations with Serge and Ken Stone are nearly finished I
      > > decided
      > > to publish the preliminary info page about the planned module on our
      > > website:
      > >
      > > www.doepfer.de/a1712.htm
      > >
      > > Maybe we will add some features so that 3-position switches can be
      > > used
      > > (e.g. log/lin/exp instead of log/lin only and two different cycle
      > > modes).
      > > But these decisions depend upon the results with the first prototype
      > > which I
      > > expect in January 2013.
      > >
      > > Best wishes
      > > Dieter Doepfer
      > >
      > >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • achtung_999
      Regarding the bipolar attenuators. Could I humbly suggest center detent pots? Ernst ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Message 2 of 26 , Dec 14, 2012
        Regarding the bipolar attenuators. Could I humbly suggest 'center detent'
        pots?

        Ernst

        On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jesse Buehler <pulsewidth2@...>wrote:

        > **
        >
        >
        > I say keep the switches. I don't have th on my quad slope but I really,
        > really wish it did! I'd rather an offset/attenuator for the far fewer times
        > I've used bipolar outs.
        >
        > Ymmv of course.
        >
        > Sent from my iPhone
        >
        >
        > On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Martin Fay <martin@...> wrote:
        >
        > > Bit of a late entry here, but there appears to be a choice between
        > > including the cycle switch (not found on a stock STS DUSG) or a
        > > bipolar output (present).
        > >
        > > Cycle can be patch-programmed with a patch cord from Gate to Trigger,
        > > then if Gate is used for anything else it would need to be mult-ed.
        > >
        > > Bipolar can be patch-programmed using i.e. an offset/attenuator module.
        > >
        > > Is this trade-off worth a poll at some point?
        > >
        > > Martin
        > >
        > > Sent from my iPhone
        > >
        > > On 12 Dec 2012, at 15:11, <yahoo@...> wrote:
        > >
        > > > As the negotiations with Serge and Ken Stone are nearly finished I
        > > > decided
        > > > to publish the preliminary info page about the planned module on our
        > > > website:
        > > >
        > > > www.doepfer.de/a1712.htm
        > > >
        > > > Maybe we will add some features so that 3-position switches can be
        > > > used
        > > > (e.g. log/lin/exp instead of log/lin only and two different cycle
        > > > modes).
        > > > But these decisions depend upon the results with the first prototype
        > > > which I
        > > > expect in January 2013.
        > > >
        > > > Best wishes
        > > > Dieter Doepfer
        > > >
        > > >
        > >
        > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        > >
        > >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
        >
        >


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.