Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Digest Number 22

Expand Messages
  • Robert Jung
    ... that again ,then load back into still run out 200ml and throw away,thenthe next 5 by de-refluxed you mean disabling the cooling reflux tower? why would you
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 28, 1999
    • 0 Attachment
      > Date: 28 Oct 1999 07:59:40 -0000
      > From: bj-fm@...
      >Subject: reply to ray

      >especially no bloody sugar----when attenuated load into your pot still or DE-
      >REFLUXED reflux still run out about one third of what you loaded in ,do
      that again ,then load back into still run out 200ml and throw away,thenthe
      next 5

      by de-refluxed you mean disabling the cooling reflux tower? why would you
      do that? i thought that in all cases a reflux tower was more beneficial
      than a pot design?

      additionaly

      >> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 08:00:54 +1300
      >> From: "Mike" <mike@...>
      >>Subject: Ready Reckoner
      >Mike, can I have your permission to forward this post to the SCA Distilling
      >list?

      where can i find that list?
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.