Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

PRESS: Councillors gagged in battle for county farm

Expand Messages
  • Tony Gosling
    The Land Is Ours Balham Hill Farm Shop PRESS RELEASE Chiselborough, Somerset Thursday 4 May 2006 tel: 01935 881114, 01460 249204 “GAGS ON COUNTY COUNCILLORS
    Message 1 of 1 , May 4, 2006
      The Land Is Ours
      Balham Hill Farm Shop
      PRESS RELEASE Chiselborough, Somerset
      Thursday 4 May 2006 tel: 01935 881114, 01460 249204

      �GAGS ON COUNTY COUNCILLORS SHOULD BE LIFTED � SAY SQUATTERS, AS POSSESSION
      ORDER IS GIVEN ON BALHAM HILL FARM

      Protesters occupying Balham Hill Farm accused Somerset County Council�s
      legal department of gagging Councillors in the run up to today's court
      case, in Yeovil County Court, in which the council were given possession of
      the squatted farm.

      Earlier in the week, protesters trrying to stop the sale of the farm and
      farm shop were jubilant when news filtered through that the 87 acre farm,
      owned by the County Council, had been withdrawn from the auction, due to be
      held on 16 May. The farm is still up for sale, but a new auction date has
      yet to be fixed.

      On Thursday, protesters shrugged aside the possession order, which requires
      them to leave the premises within the next few days . One of them, Mary
      Durling (a mother of two who used to sell cordials and herbal products
      through the original farm shop) commented: �The possession order is what we
      expected. We have never claimed that we wanted to stay on the farm
      indefinitely. This has been a friendly protest from local people opposed to
      the break up and sale of a publicly owned farm; at some point we need to
      get back home and get on with our lives.�

      But protesters were angry at the Council�s leaders, who, they claimed, had
      sent out a directive ordering county councillors not to engage in dialogue
      with the protesters.
      Protesters� spokesman Chris Black said: �At first, councillors we spoke to
      were happy to talk about the issues, then mysteriously they clammed up.
      This was because the Council�s legal department had sent out an e-mail
      informing all councillors that they must not talk about the matter because
      there was an ongoing legal action. This is a blatantly political directive
      to silence debate, dressed up as a legal one.�

      Another of the protesters, Simon Fairlie, explained:
      � This gagging order is quite unnecessary. Everyone knows that we are
      making no claim upon the ownership of the farm, and that our occupation is
      symbolic. We moved onto the farm and reopened the shop to create a dialogue
      between the County Council and the public about the future of County
      Council farms.�

      Chris Black added: �From our initial discussions with councillors before
      they were gagged, we know that the majority are uneasy with the policy of
      selling off County Council farms. The whole business has been an eye-opener
      for us about the way the council works. Frankly, it stinks. The executive
      board are trying to push
      through a policy which doesn�t have support amongst rank and file
      councillors, and as soon as there is a public protest they try to stifle
      debate by any means they can.�
      �Now the court proceedings are over, there is no reason why councillors
      cannot talk with us about the future of County Farm Estate. Let�s have a
      really good public debate about how this superb publicly-owned resource can
      be used in the best way to support farmers, local food production and local
      economies.�

      For more information phone Balham Hill Farm, 01935 881975, 07881 636834,
      01460 249204
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.