Re: [CREATIONscience] Who has sand in their ears? # 2
- "Mikey" <mikeybrass@...> wrote:
>I asked you a very simple question and you replyI'd give up if I were you.
>with this drivel. Do you have the guts to come and
>defend yourself in front of scientists or do you
>want to continue being a coward hiding behind the
>blanket of superstition and illiterate moderation
>If you are as intelligent as you claim, try
>answering a straight forward question.
I have, sadly, been forced to admit that working
towards converting creationists is largely a waste of
time. As such, I remain for three reasons:
1. To demonstrate the flaws in creationism before the
more open-minded lurkers.
2. Because I learn cool stuff from everyone else's
3. To practice explaining complicated scientific
concepts as clearly as possible.
Note that neither of the first two will ever be
accomplished on CreationSCIENCE.
If all it ends up doing is frustrating you, forget
Atheist, n. A man with no invisible means of support.
Egotist, n. A person of low taste,
more interested in himself than in me.
- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> I'd give up if I were you.I am. I'm through arguing with stupid morons on that list.
> Note that neither of the first two will ever beNot unless a miracle happens.
> accomplished on CreationSCIENCE.