Re: Mike Johnson 949 customs wants to know the best arguements for evolution
- --- In DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis Kean" <dk@...> wrote:
>Your religous opinions are irrelevent to this forum which contns members with a wide variety of religious views. This is a science-only forum. As the creationists keep telling us, and the courts (under oath, creationism (and ts scam, ID) is proven by science alone, without reference to religion.
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by our Antivirus and Antispam MailScanners
> and is believed to be clean.
> If you find that this message does contain a virus or came as spam,
> please contact NexGen Business:
Or are they lying?
So why do you have to keep peaching your religion? No-one in this group gives a stuff about your religious opinions (or mine). Only your science.
- On 1 May 2009 at 19:16, Anne Gilbert wrote:
> Brian:Without running a bunch of math, I would not be able to straighten
> He tries to disprove Einstein???? I don't think I have the strength
> for this!
> Anne G
> [[[Re: a moderator warning
> Posted by: "Dennis Kean" dk@... datalite4
> Date: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:08 pm ((PDT))
> When the cursing begins the argument has ended. We thank you for
> conceding, though through a subterfuge. This one did not take long
> and I will make a note of it. Genesis is pretty tough to beat,
> Lenny. Maybe you can change the title of the forum, now. It is no
> longer possible to call it DebunkCreation". But you could now call
> it "Debunked BY Creationism!" And no more cursing, young lad... We
> all know that you can curse, by now, when you lose. The question is
> can you think? That remains to be determined, but we will not test
> you on that. That opinion has already been formed for me.]]]
> ---Well, waddya know. After years of silence, we suddenly have a
> veritable mass invasion of creationists.
> I went to have a look at the guy's website at
> A talented artist and composer, and for all I know his disproof of
> Einstein might also make perfect sense. I would advise him not to
> dabble in biology though.
out his physics either. I would suggest he read and understand Max
Born before being too critical of Einstein. SR only works with
inertial (non-accelerating) reference frames. Spaceships are things
that accelerate. Compared to earth, the spaceship in his story
accelerates a LOT, both negative and positive acceleration with
respect to the earth frame.