Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Rumsfeld on board of company that built N Korea nuclear reactors

Expand Messages
  • Aniruddha Das
    RUMSFELD Rummy s North Korea Connection What did Donald Rumsfeld know about ABB s deal to build nuclear reactors there? And why won t he talk about it? FORTUNE
    Message 1 of 1 , May 1, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      Rummy's North Korea Connection
      What did Donald Rumsfeld know about ABB's deal to build nuclear reactors
      And why won't he talk about it?

      FORTUNE Monday, April 28, 2003 By Richard Behar


      Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld rarely keeps his opinions to himself. He
      tends not to compromise with his enemies. And he clearly disdains the
      communist regime in North Korea. So it's surprising that there is no clear
      public record of his views on the controversial 1994 deal in which the U.S.
      agreed to provide North Korea with two light-water nuclear reactors in
      exchange for Pyongyang ending its nuclear weapons program. What's even more
      surprising about Rumsfeld's silence is that he sat on the board of the
      company that won a $200 million contract to provide the design and key
      components for the reactors.

      The company is Zurich-based engineering giant ABB, which signed the
      contract in early 2000, well before Rumsfeld gave up his board seat and
      joined the Bush administration. Rumsfeld, the only American director on the
      ABB board from 1990 to early 2001, has never acknowledged that he knew the
      company was competing for the nuclear contract. Nor could FORTUNE find any
      public reference to what he thought about the project. In response to
      questions about his role in the reactor deal, the Defense Secretary's
      spokeswoman Victoria Clarke told Newsweek in February that "there was no
      vote on this" and that her boss "does not recall it being brought before
      the board at any time."

      Rumsfeld declined requests by FORTUNE to elaborate on his role. But ABB
      spokesman Bjoern Edlund has told FORTUNE that "board members were informed
      about this project." And other ABB officials say there is no way such a
      large and high-stakes project, involving complex questions of liability,
      would not have come to the attention of the board. "A written summary would
      probably have gone to the board before the deal was signed," says Robert
      Newman, a former president of ABB's U.S. nuclear division who spearheaded
      the project. "I'm sure they were aware."

      FORTUNE contacted 15 ABB board members who served at the time the company
      was bidding for the Pyongyang contract, and all but one declined to
      comment. That director, who asked not to be identified, says he's convinced
      that ABB's chairman at the time, Percy Barnevik, told the board about the
      reactor project in the mid-1990s. "This was a major thing for ABB," the
      former director says, "and extensive political lobbying was done."

      The director recalls being told that Rumsfeld was asked "to lobby in
      Washington" on ABB's behalf in the mid-1990s because a rival American
      company had complained about a foreign-owned firm getting the work.
      Although he couldn't provide details, Goran Lundberg, who ran ABB's
      power-generation business until 1995, says he's "pretty sure that at some
      point Don was involved," since it was not unusual to seek help from board
      members "when we needed contacts with the U.S. government." Other former
      top executives don't recall Rumsfeld's involvement.

      Today Rumsfeld, riding high after the Iraq war, is reportedly discussing a
      plan for "regime change" in North Korea. But his silence about the nuclear
      reactors raises questions about what he did--or didn't do--as an ABB
      director. There is no evidence that Rumsfeld, who took a keen interest in
      the company's nuclear business and attended most board meetings, made his
      views about the project known to other ABB officials. He certainly never
      made them public, even though the deal was criticized by many people close
      to Rumsfeld, who said weapons-grade nuclear material could be extracted
      from light-water reactors. Paul Wolfowitz, James Lilley, and Richard
      Armitage, all Rumsfeld allies, are on record opposing the deal. So is
      former presidential candidate Bob Dole, for whom Rumsfeld served as
      campaign manager and chief defense advisor. And Henry Sokolski, whose think
      tank received funding from a foundation on whose board Rumsfeld sat, has
      been one of the most vocal opponents of the 1994 agreement.

      One clue to Rumsfeld's views: a Heritage Foundation speech in March 1998.
      Although he did not mention the light-water reactors, Rumsfeld said the
      1994 Agreed Framework with North Korea "does not end its nuclear menace; it
      merely postpones the reckoning, with no assurance that we will know how
      much bomb-capable material North Korea has." A search of numerous databases
      found no press references at the time, or throughout the 1990s, noting
      Rumsfeld was a director of the company building the reactors. And Rumsfeld
      didn't bring it up either.

      ABB, which was already building eight nuclear reactors in South Korea, had
      an inside track on the $4 billion U.S.-sponsored North Korea project. The
      firm was told "our participation is essential," recalls Frank Murray,
      project manager for the reactors. (He plays the same role now at
      Westinghouse, which was acquired by Britain's BNFL in 1999, a year before
      it also bought ABB's nuclear power business.) The North Korean reactors are
      being primarily funded by South Korean and Japanese export-import banks and
      supervised by KEDO, a consortium based in New York. "It was not a matter of
      favoritism," says Desaix Anderson, who ran KEDO from 1997 to 2001. "It was
      just a practical matter."

      Even so, ABB tried to keep its involvement hush-hush. In a 1995 letter from
      ABB to the Department of Energy obtained by FORTUNE, the firm requested
      authorization to release technology to the North Koreans, then asked that
      the seemingly innocuous one-page letter be withheld from public disclosure.
      "Everything was held close to the vest for some reason," says Ronald Kurtz,
      ABB's U.S. spokesman. "It wasn't as public as contracts of this magnitude
      typically are."

      However discreet ABB tried to be about the project, Kurtz and other company
      insiders say the board had to have known about it. Newman, the former ABB
      executive, says a written summary of the risk review would probably have
      gone to Barnevik. Barnevik didn't return FORTUNE's phone calls, but
      Newman's Zurich-based boss, Howard Pierce, says Rumsfeld "was on the
      board--so I can only assume he was aware of it."

      By all accounts Rumsfeld was a hands-on director. Dick Slember, who once
      ran ABB's global nuclear business, says Rumsfeld often called to talk about
      issues involving nuclear proliferation, and that it was difficult to "get
      him pointed in the right direction." Pierce, who recalls Rumsfeld visiting
      China to help ABB get nuclear contracts, says, "Once he got an idea, it was
      tough to change his mind. You really had to work your ass off to turn him
      around." Shelby Brewer, a former head of ABB's nuclear business in the
      U.S., recalls meetings with Rumsfeld at the division's headquarters in
      Connecticut. "I found him enchanting and brilliant," he says. "He would cut
      through Europeans' bullshit like a hot knife through butter."

      None of them could recall Rumsfeld talking about the North Korea project.
      But if he was keeping his opinions to himself, others were not. The
      Republicans attacked the deal from the start, particularly after gaining
      control of Congress in 1994. "The Agreed Framework was a political orphan
      within two weeks after its signature," says Stephen Bosworth, KEDO's first
      executive director and a former U.S. ambassador to South Korea. It's not
      hard to understand why it was controversial. North Korea is on the list of
      state sponsors of terrorism and has repeatedly violated the terms of the
      Non-Proliferation Treaty. Robert Gallucci, the assistant secretary of state
      who spearheaded the 1994 agreement, doesn't disagree, but says, "If we
      didn't do a deal, either we would have gone to war or they'd have over 100
      nuclear weapons."

      The problem, say a number of nuclear energy experts, is that it's possible,
      though difficult, to extract weapons-grade material from light-water
      reactors. "Reprocessing the stuff is not a big deal," says Victor Gilinsky,
      who has held senior posts at the Atomic Energy Commission and the Nuclear
      Regulatory Commission. "You don't even need special equipment. The KEDO
      people ignore this. And we're still building the damn things."

      Given the Republican outcry over the reactor deal, Rumsfeld's public
      silence is nearly deafening. "Almost any Republican was complaining about
      it," says Winston Lord, President Clinton's assistant secretary of state
      for East Asian/Pacific Affairs. Lord can't remember Rumsfeld speaking out.
      Nor can Frank Gaffney Jr., whose fervently anti-KEDO Center for Security
      Policy had ties to Rumsfeld. Gaffney speculates that Rumsfeld might have
      recused himself from the controversy because of his ABB position.

      By 1998 a debate was raging in Washington about the initiative, and the
      delays were infuriating Pyongyang. Inspectors could no longer verify North
      Korea's nuclear material inventory. Still, at some point in 1998, ABB
      received its formal "invitation to bid," says Murray. Where was Rumsfeld?
      That year he chaired a blue-ribbon panel commissioned by Congress to
      examine classified data on ballistic missile threats. The commission
      concluded that North Korea could strike the U.S. within five years. (Weeks
      after the report was released, it fired a three-stage rocket over Japan.)
      The Rumsfeld Commission also concluded that North Korea was maintaining a
      nuclear weapons program--a subtle swipe at the reactor deal, which was
      supposed to prevent such a program. Rumsfeld's resume in the report did not
      mention that he was an ABB director.

      In his final days in office, Clinton had been preparing a bold deal in
      which North Korea would give up its missile and nuclear programs in return
      for aid and normalized relations. But President Bush was skeptical of
      Pyongyang's intentions and called for a policy review in March 2001. Two
      months later the DOE, after consulting with Rumsfeld's Pentagon, renewed
      the authorization to send nuclear technology to North Korea. Groundbreaking
      ceremonies attended by Westinghouse and North Korean officials were held
      Sept. 14, 2001--three days after the worst terror attack on U.S. soil.

      The Bush administration still hasn't abandoned the project. Representative
      Edward Markey and other Congressmen have been sending letters to Bush and
      Rumsfeld, asking them to pull the plug on the reactors, which Markey calls
      "nuclear bomb factories." Nevertheless, a concrete-pouring ceremony was
      held last August, and Westinghouse sponsored a training course for the
      North Koreans that concluded in October--shortly before Pyongyang confessed
      to having a secret uranium program, kicked inspectors out, and said it
      would start making plutonium. The Bush administration has suspended further
      transfers of nuclear technology, but in January it authorized $3.5 million
      to keep the project going.

      Sooner or later, the outspoken Secretary of Defense will have to explain
      his silence.

      Feedback: rbehar@...
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.