Re: [DBA] Re: DBA LIST IV 19-a Tarascans and b Chinantecs
- Thanks for your reply. If it was a small sword, was it smaller than
the Roman gladius? Could you (or anyone else) send a reference on
this? I'm interestested in learning more about the Chinantec.
On May 2, 2011, at 2:18 PM, WilliamM wrote:
> --- In DBA@yahoogroups.com, Don Ray <ray@...> wrote:
> > Hi Peter
> > Yes, the Chinantecs should be a separate sub-list. I liked your
> > proposed Chinantec army. I wondered if the Gen. could be Bw or Bd
> > since they had both bows and big club blades.
> The "club blade" wasn't that big. It hung from the draw arm and
> can't have been so big or it would have interfered with archery.
> > I recall Heath writing
> > that the nobles preferred bow, but wondered why then would they
> > carry their "swords".
> For the same reason that a lot of other archers carried their swords
> (think English longbowmen)
> > Best regards,
> > Don
> > On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Peter Feinler wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, hrld_plmr <hrld_plmr@...> wrote:
>I don't have the book with me, but didn't the published list turn the
> --- In DBA@yahoogroups.com, "suzanlb" <sue@...> wrote:
>> These are now ready and I will post them to you for comments.
> Just looking at IV/13a - the Sp don't have to be City Militia in DBMM - they can be Heerban, who could appear in Imperial or Feudal armies, so the 1 aggression is not necessarily true.
Heerbann Sp into Bd?
> By the way (and I'm not trolling, I just find the threads a little hard to follow as debate on this forum is wide ranging and energetic!) has the possibility of a new troop type covering Pk(F) been discussed anywhere?There's been quite some discussion of it on Fanaticus.org - try
searching for "Light Spear".
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?