Re: DBA LIST IV 19-a Tarascans and b Chinantecs
- --- In DBA@yahoogroups.com, Don Ray <ray@...> wrote:
>The "club blade" wasn't that big. It hung from the draw arm and can't have been so big or it would have interfered with archery.
> Hi Peter
> Yes, the Chinantecs should be a separate sub-list. I liked your
> proposed Chinantec army. I wondered if the Gen. could be Bw or Bd
> since they had both bows and big club blades.
> I recall Heath writingFor the same reason that a lot of other archers carried their swords (think English longbowmen)
> that the nobles preferred bow, but wondered why then would they
> carry their "swords".
> Best regards,
> On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Peter Feinler wrote:
- On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, hrld_plmr <hrld_plmr@...> wrote:
>I don't have the book with me, but didn't the published list turn the
> --- In DBA@yahoogroups.com, "suzanlb" <sue@...> wrote:
>> These are now ready and I will post them to you for comments.
> Just looking at IV/13a - the Sp don't have to be City Militia in DBMM - they can be Heerban, who could appear in Imperial or Feudal armies, so the 1 aggression is not necessarily true.
Heerbann Sp into Bd?
> By the way (and I'm not trolling, I just find the threads a little hard to follow as debate on this forum is wide ranging and energetic!) has the possibility of a new troop type covering Pk(F) been discussed anywhere?There's been quite some discussion of it on Fanaticus.org - try
searching for "Light Spear".
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?