RE: Re: Re: TERM Itanglish legalese + free utilities
- Hi Rachel,
> > IfOK, fair enough. I just assumed he was referring to the original (and there
> > > nothing follows on, a relative clause would be preferable:
> > > which have been overcome'.
> > Surely without the comma (as in Coilin's suggestion), as it's a defining
> > clause.
> As Simon wasn't using the original example, I don't think you can say
> whether it's a defining or non-defining clause (it isn't a complete
> sentence, so you don't know what comes before or after).
was talk of turning Czechlist into a grammar club!). But I shall now
dismount from my hobby horse.