- Urcite ano:
- Cloister Osek Cisterciacky klaster Osek
CZ-417 15 Osek Tel.: (417) - 937393
Konzerte * Ausstellungen
- In a message dated 9/4/01 7:31:56 AM, otto@... writes:
> - Cloister Osek Cisterciacky klaster OsekThank you, but this is a Czenglish translation, like "cosmetics Avon". The
> CZ-417 15 Osek Tel.: (417) - 937393
> Konzerte * Ausstellungen
word "cloister" doesn't help me, because it's not really natural to use in an
ordinary modern text, and it still doesn't tell whether the building is a
monastery or a convent. Plus, nowadays the word "cloister" usually indicates
the part of a convent where certain nuns are perpetually isolated in
individual cells, rather than the whole convent.
So, this is my problem. I need to know if the klaster was a monastery or a
- Sorry Jamie,
I misunderstood your question and didn't want to offend you with
Czenglish. I thought you were asking if such monastery existed at all.
AFAIK - ciesterciaci were monks rather than nuns, see
- In a message dated 9/4/01 7:44:17 AM, otto@... writes:
>I misunderstood your question and didn't want to offend you withNo offense taken.
>Czenglish. I thought you were asking if such monastery existed at all.
>AFAIK - ciesterciaci were monks rather than nuns, seeThanks very much. I thought there were also Cistercian nuns, though. This
is going to take some investigation.
- There's a very respectable-looking site at
which goes into the history of the Cistercian Monastery at Osek.
Haven't had time to read it all but it seems pretty clear from a quick
skim that it was established and operated by Cistercian monks.
- In a message dated 9/4/01 7:57:14 AM, zehrovak@... writes:
>http://fmv.vse.cz/cz/castles/osek.htm.Thank you. This helps me a lot!
>which goes into the history of the Cistercian Monastery at Osek.
>Haven't had time to read it all but it seems pretty clear from a quick
>skim that it was established and operated by Cistercian monks.
- --- In Czechlist@y..., JPKIRCHNER@a... wrote:
>Curses! First I hit the send button and then I spotted the period at
> In a message dated 9/4/01 7:57:14 AM, zehrovak@d... writes:
the end of the link. Of course, this should read:
BTW I'd definitely agree that there are Cistercian nuns too.
> Thank you, but this is a Czenglish translation ... The
> word "cloister" doesn't help me, because it's not really natural to use in
> ordinary modern text, and it still doesn't tell whether the building is aI am not trying to pick a fight :-) but I think "cloister" is totally fine
> monastery or a convent.
even in a modern English context, and I have heard it used quite frequently
in good old Catholic Ireland. It is a very handy word if you want to refer
to monasteries and convents in general or if you don' t know whether such a
building houses nuns or monks. It is also defined by the OED as "a convent
or monastery" without any reference being made to its having fallen out of
usage. I think that sometimes in our desperation to avoid Czenglish, we
overcompensate and end up "dumbing down" our translations. We shouldn' t
underestimate the intelligence of our target readership. As a native
speaker, if I am reading a text on an area with which I am not familiar and
I find a word I don' t know, I am quite willing to look up an
English-English dictionary to find out what it means. After all, without
over 700,000 words in the English language one can't know them all.
> English-English dictionary to find out what it means. After all, withoutWhoops! this should be "with over 700,000 words"
> over 700,000 words in the English language one can't know them all.
> >which goes into the history of the Cistercian Monastery at Osek.FWIW, I used 'Osek Monastery' and 'the Cistercian monastery in* Osek' in
> >Haven't had time to read it all but it seems pretty clear from a quick
> >skim that it was established and operated by Cistercian monks.
the Molitor catalogue I translated last summer.
*I suppose 'at' might be preferable if (as it seems) Osek is a small
- I don't know about precision vs. dumbing down, and my existence is so
cloistered that it fails to include much modern Irish, but I think the whole
debate hinges on who uses the word most, to whom, and in what, and whether
our translation will create confusion or not.
The people who use the word 'cloister(s)' most in English are those who
write about architecture. They do so to inform fellow architects of a
particular kind of structure, or to describe such a structure to
tourists/interested visitors. The word usually appears in journals and
This structure/area may be part of a monastery or a nunnery. It is not
usually the whole thing. My ancient Chambers Etymological Dictionary gives:
'a covered arcade forming a part of a monastic or collegiate establishment;
a place of religious retirement, a monastery or a nunnery' then derives the
word from Old French and Latin for 'to shut, close'.
A Faber dictionary of architecture (1993): 'A covered and often vaulted walk
around an open space (or Garth) that is usually square on plan, having a
largely solid outer wall and openings, sometimes filled with tracery, on the
garth. A feature particularly of monasteries, in which it forms a passageway
from the church to the chapter-house, refectory, etc.
IMO, whatever its original meaning or use - and whatever relict usage
survives in special circumstances such as religion-marinated Erin Go Brath -
'cloister' as a noun refers to part of a building/complex, not the whole
thing. As a verb, it means 'to confine', with overtones of uncomfortable but
necessary proximity, possibly secrecy; 'he's been cloistered with the
designers for hours. I wonder what they're cooking up'.
In all the religious, historical, and tourist literature we have translated
over the years, I have always avoided using the word 'cloister' at all, in
order to avoid confusion. If it's a place, then it's a monastery, convent,
nunnery, retreat, college, etc. If it's a covered walk with fancy vaulting
around a courtyard, then that's what I say, one way or another. The
definitions often mean that we have to talk to the author or even ask for
photographs or go for a look - not always practical, I know.
False friends always seem to invite the 'shoe-horn' approach - with
etymology at one's side, a body of loose usage from previous literature
egging one on, and a cosy feeling of technical rectitude, one squeezes the
meaning into the word and leaves the text to limp on - in the assumption
that one will never have to meet it again, a couple of years later, and see
just how crippled it is ....
As a hollow laugh and a reminder to beware of similar-looking words,
especially on Latin roots, the pencil-holder on our kitchen shelf is a posh
jar from Harrods (booty from some pharma-freebie), the label of which
proudly proclaims: 'Home Produced Organic Marmalade guaranteed free of
artificial preservatives'. I should bloodywell hope so - but there's a
couple more in there as well.
- I liked your discussion of this word.
>The people who use the word 'cloister(s)' most in English are those whoIt depends on what you are exposed to in life. I hear the term "cloister"
>write about architecture.
used far less in an architectural meaning than in relation to the practice of
cloistering nuns. In that sense too, it refers only to part of the convent