THANKS: TERM: aktualnost
- Thanks go to Melvyn and Otto for helping me through a difficult time.
I particularly liked Melvyn's active/inactive suggestion - suitably
vague and a whole lot better than "topicality", "validity" and
"relevance". My feeling is that "platnost" is too specific in this
context. The documents being stored are mostly routine paperwork
(such as copies of letters), so they don't have a well-defined or
inherent period of validity.
> "pozbyt na aktualnosti"had to be turned around somewhat, e.g. "when the document no longer
> "po uplynuti administrativni aktualnosti"
> "pred skonceni aktualnost"
has active status". (Somebody then has to decide whether it can be
shredded or whether it should be sent to the archive for long-term
> "kazda instituce je povninna provadet predarchivni pece"Here I went for: "every institution is required to operate a system
> "prirucni spisovny"For this I used "reference registries", based on Melvyn's suggestion
(although I removed the reference to archive so as to avoid confusion
with the archive itself).