> Dobry den,

I don't see that anyone has answered this part. If

> z nasledujiciho textu mi neni jasna cast "required to pay or withold in

> respect to or calculated with reference to such amount, the remainder

> actually received by, due"

>

> All payments . . . shall be . . .

> . . . in an amount[***] . . .

> . . . such that after deduction of any [charges] . . .

> . . . which . . . any . . . party

> shall be required to pay or withold in respect to or calculated

> with reference to such amount[***], the remainder . . .

> . . . payable to X shall be the amou[n]ts specified in this Agreement.

it's not too late, to help, I parse it as:

". . . [an amount] such that after deduction of any charges

which any of these people are required

to pay or withold (i.e., to hold

in reserve for later payment to the gov't[*n1])

in respect to or calculated

with reference to such amount [*n2]

the remainder [i.e., amount minus charges = remainder]

actually paid will be the agreed amount."

*** The antecedent for "such amount" is "in an amount"

n1: the U.S. has a witholding system: so the charges

are ones _either_ paid or witheld for later payment

n2: "in respect to or calculated with reference to" is

arguably redundant (actually, there's law about the

difference between taxes "on" certain amounts, and

taxes "measured by" or "calculated on" amounts -- but

for present purposes, ignore it); you can probably

treat it as being simply "s ohledem"

In short, the deal is: (1) we've agreed to a certain

amount that X should get, net after everything. (2) We

know that there will be taxes or other charges on

anything paid to X. (3) We can do the math on how

much the tax and charges will be. (4) Any math that

we can do forward, we can do backwards. (5)

Therefore, the *beginning* amount has to be more than

the *agreed NET* amount, by just exactly as much as

will work out in the math.

For example, if for every $100 X gets, the tax laws say

X must pay or withold 20% ($20), then we know X would

only get $80 net. In order to make sure that X *NETS*

the agreed $100, the amount to use at the beginning has

to be $125 -- because that way, when 20% is witheld

(20% of $125 being $25), the remainder (the net) will

be $100, the agreed amount.

As for the other questions, I take the first one

(authorizations) to mean that if licensee's government

has rules that would keep licensee from paying as

agreed, then licensee should do whatever is possible to

get the government to let licensee pay (get whatever

authorization, in whatever form is necessary: a permit,

a waiver, a declaration that a certain exception

applies, whatever).

Your last paragraph was marred by the author's attempt

to do too much: it would be to effect (make) filings,

and to obtain approvals.