Re: [Czechlist] TERM: arbitraz
- On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:07:12 +0200, Martin Janda
> Hi Michael,Diky Martine!
> Option 1 (journalist's ignorance) is the most likely - as long as the
> journalist does not talk about the old commie' days. Then, arbitraz was
> rather a special kind of court.
Upon looking closer, it turns out I'm stupid after all. The article IS
about arbitration as opposed to litigation. I mistakenly assumed that
'soud' meant a court of law, but in this context it was an arbitration
My logic is this: we have one environment. It's not like eyeballs
where if you accidentally poke one out, playing with sticks like your
mother told you not to, there's a second one available and you can go
on seeing and call it a lesson learned.
- Alan Blevins