Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

42618Re: [Czechlist] Re: Comprehension

Expand Messages
  • James Kirchner
    Mar 31, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Kostas, it's the pattern of behavior, not only on list but off list.

      JK

      On Mar 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Kostas wrote:

      > I somehow do not see in Sarka's question anything of being colicky or taking it out on any one.
      >
      > K.
      >
      > > Sarka, I don't know what has made you colicky lately, but it appears that often when you feel out of sorts you take it out on me. You should probably focus more on whoever or whatever it is in your life that's tormenting you.
      > >
      > > Jamie
      > >
      > > On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Sarka Rubkova wrote:
      > >
      > > > So, you believe that something what was true "once" is the truth forever?
      > > > Interesting.
      > > >
      > > > Sarka
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > -------Original Message-------
      > > >
      > > > From: James Kirchner
      > > > Date: 28.3.2010 14:36:14
      > > > To: Czechlist@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: Re: [Czechlist] Comprehension
      > > >
      > > > Because I once lived in the Czech Republic and nearly all infant girls had
      > > > pierced ears with gold earrings.
      > > >
      > > > JK
      > > >
      > > > On Mar 28, 2010, at 7:08 AM, Sarka Rubkova wrote:
      > > >
      > > > > How did you come to the idea that if the child were a girl, her earlobes
      > > > > would already have been pierced practically at birth?
      > > > >
      > > > > Sarka
      > > > >
      > > > > -------Original Message-------
      > > > >
      > > > > From: James Kirchner
      > > > > Date: 25.3.2010 12:07:22
      > > > > To: Czechlist@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: Re: [Czechlist] Comprehension
      > > > >
      > > > > Well, there you go. I suppose that if the child were a girl, her earlobes
      > > > > would already have been pierced practically at birth and I'd see earrings
      > > > on
      > > > > her. In the US, there would be no way to identify that child's gender
      > > > > visually.
      > > > >
      > > > > Thanks, everybody.
      > > > >
      > > > > Jamie
      > > > >
      > > > > On Mar 25, 2010, at 6:56 AM, Jirka Bolech wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > > I confirm Alena's thought: it's "maleho Adamka" (little Adam), and the
      > > > > child
      > > > > > is a really a boy...
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Jirka Bolech
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > ------------------------------------
      > > > >
      > > > > Translators' tricks of the trade:
      > > > > http://czeng.wetpaint.com/
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > > Translators' tricks of the trade:
      > > > http://czeng.wetpaint.com/
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      >
      >



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 21 messages in this topic