Re: Bush and the creation movement
- --- In CreationTalk@yahoogroups.com, Teno Groppi <tgroppi@n...>
> >There is a clear difference on the abortion issue affecting
> >lives. If all other factors were equal (and they are not) thisalone
> >indicates a choice of Kerry is wrong. PaulCourt justices who passed Roe vs. Wade.
> What is the clear difference? It's the Republican Supreme
Paul: Liberal justices support Roe which incidently was established
decades ago by justices who are by and large deceased.
It's Bush who sends millions of OUR
> dollars to Planned Barrenhood and the UN for abortion, andsupports the RU-486 abortion pill.
Paul; Congress allots funds and one of its most enthusiastic
supporters of the above is John Kerry.
It's Bush's partial-birth abortion "ban" which calls
> the other methods of abortion "ESTABLISHED ... ALTERNATIVE ...VALID"
> methods and allows partial-birth abortions so long as the baby isnot delivered past the navel.
Paul: Last week a federal court nullified the partial-birth ban in
its entirety because it lacked provisions for the health of the
mother; a pretext in my view but serving to illustrate how difficult
it is to get ANY partial birth bill by both the Congress and the
courts. Any proposal not containing the provisions cited, which
incidently are passed by a Congress that revises the original
executive proposal, would be DOA in committee.
>conservative, but his actions are just as liberal.
> The other factors ARE equal. Bush and Kerry have the same
> political agenda. Bush may occasionally TALK a little more
Paul: Kerry is an ultra-liberal as judged by his voting record which
is not moderate even by Democratic standards. His record on defense
issues alone bears this out.
He is a bigger spender than Clinton
> was, creating HUGE deficits.Paul: The deficits are a function of declining revenues and huge
increases in spending on security and the war.
Despite his rhetoric, he has advanced the
> sodomite agenda like no one before.Paul: I assume this refers to the homosexual agenda. How Bush has
advanced it is very unclear.
>Paul: There were those in the Weimar Republic that applied the same
> BTW, I agree the choice of Kerry is wrong, that was not in
> dispute. The choice of Bush is also wrong.
reasoning to elections involving Herr Hitler. When was the last
time a candidate for president satisfied your standards? Lack of
participation in the electoral process all but guarantees a
government hostile to Christian values.
> Teno Groppi - Country Celebration
> Constitution Party - Past WI District & County Rep.
> Democrats and Republicans are two wings of a bird flying the WRONG
> If we are not "One Nation Under God", we'll just be "one nationunder".
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >(am I remembering that correctly). Hillary got a landslide in a suburbanOh, one other thing about Hillary's election. I was switching
> >area of New York City that *-never-* votes Democrat, in a year when all
> >the Democrats running for office told the Clintons to stay as far away
> >from them as Mars
between CNN and FOX on election night, and I don't remember which one it
was, but one of them had already declared Hillary the winner with just 1%
of the vote counted and Lazio winning 51%-49% at the time. Tell me that
didn't influence a lot of voters to stay home.
Here, there, or in the air!
God & Country Center
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]