Problems with Evolution
- Hi All,
This is my first post to the group. My name is Todd Talcott. I'm
trying to get a better understanding of the evolutionists position.
Does anyone know what the most pressing problems are that
evolutionists have with evolution? In other words, I am assuming
that there are scientists out there that believe in evolution in
general, but have specific problems with the most widely accepted (by
evolutionists) current particular methods by which nature is believed
to have evolved. What are the different arguments for each
evolutionary approach? If anyone knows of books or websites, I would
appreciate knowing about those as well.
- --- In CreationEvolutionDesign@yahoogroups.com, Paul <pk4_paul@y...>
> > Pick some point that you're comfortable callingI'm not sure what you're saying. I have no preconceived notion about
> > life. All the
> > precursors of that organism are non-life, but
> > critical to the
> > evolution of the first lifeforms.
> > ~~ Paul
> Paul: Prokarotic organisms. You're not going to
> establish a point by defining it in such a way that it
> fits your preconceptions. A precursor can be labeled
> such when the outcome is verified i.e. showing the
> chemical trail that starts with "precursors" and ends
> with a functional prokartote. Experimental evidence
> not the usual story. That is the way you approach
> unknown questions right?
what is life and what is not, because I think it's nothing more than
a matter of definition. But yes, I agree that evidence is required
for establishing the origin of "life."