Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8199Re: Dembski's reply to WSJ article `flaws in intelligent design'

Expand Messages
  • Cliff Lundberg
    Feb 16, 2004
      From: "Stephen E. Jones" <sejones@...>
      > Here, as posted on another list, is Dembski's response to the
      WSJ article,

      > "...probably are a number of steps that can transform a
      > into a flagellum... But what are those steps? How small can they
      > made? And is it reasonable to think that those steps could be
      > apart from design?

      Why is the flagellum such an icon? It's basically something that
      That's all it does. Why is it such a great trick to evolve
      something that
      wiggles? (And then improve it).

    • Show all 3 messages in this topic