14646Re: MODERATOR The End of CED
- Jul 21, 2005Group
From: John Distazo <John.Distazo@...>
Date: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:19 pm
Subject: The End of CED
JD>Ah, the end of CED. Well, I won't hate to see it go, nor
>miss it much. It's been infamous for years as the home of*** Moderator: Actually I had been expecting something like
>Steve "the Control Freak" Jones, who has played big fish
>(or Ichthus, if you will) in the small, scummy pond of
>creationism. I have to admit I've seen a lot of good debate
>here, but none of it coming from Steve or his minions,
>who've all seen fit to flout his rules as Steve winks and
>turns a blind eye to it while muzzling his opponents at the
>drop of his moderator's hat. [...]
this from John, and to be consistent I have now removed his
posting privileges on CED.
John's post is its own refutation. If I `muzzle my
opponents at the drop of my moderator's hat', then how has
John been able to remain unmoderated on CED for so long?
The answer is that John has not broken any of CED's rules
(until this post).
The fact is that: 1) I have only moderated members (both on
the creation/ID and evolution side) who break CED's rules
(consider Cliff Lundberg, an evolutionist who has been a
member of CED since its beginning and who I disagree with
on almost everything, yet he has never been moderated,
because he has never breached CED's rules), and 2) I
needed strong rules because I am a creationist Moderator
and evolutionists are the side where most (but not all) of the
nasty behaviour comes from.
Also consider John's own "scummy pond of creationism"
and "Religion is the greatest untreated disease of the
twenty-first century -- John Distazo" comments in this very
post. If I had written something like that, imagine the outrage
and posturing from John and his ilk.
However, as always I bear John and Anti-CED members no ill-will.
I wish them well for the future. ***
JD>Oh yeah, John Beadle pointed out that Steve said that if
>Anti-CED lasted longer than CED then in effect Anti-CED has*** My congratulations to John and Anti-CED on their "win"! ***
>won. And so it seems that Anti-CED will win come July 22. [...]
JD>Of course, CED will still be around... sort of. No one will
>be able to post (except Steve the moderator,*** John is right that "CED will still be around" in the form of
my blog CED <http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com>.
As with all blogs (AFAIK), "No one will be able to post"
except the blogger. However, comments can be made about
my posts to which I can reply. I have already had an
exchange with one person.
But unlike a list a blog is not measured by the number of
debates, but by the number of visits. I have just installed a
Site Meter which records the number of visits. They are
(including my own visits - have today installed some code
that will from now on exclude my own visits): "Total 106" and
Average Per Day 45", and "Today 74". I thank any Anti-CED
members who are in those totals!***
JD>and he'll be
>busy with his book, which will never be finished).*** Thanks to John for his concern, but actually my book,
"Problems of Evolution"
has been coming along nicely until the last few days. Once
this last `dying kick' of CED is over (in about 21 hours time),
I will have a *lot* more time to write my book and my blog,
which I am *really* looking forward to. ***
Stephen E. Jones
"Biology is the study of complicated things that give the
appearance of having been designed for a purpose."
(Dawkins R., "The Blind Watchmaker," , Penguin:
London, 1991, reprint, p.1)
Stephen E. Jones http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>